OPEN PEER REVIEW SUPPORT OF IJAR

Journal: International Journal of Advanced Research
Publisher: Jana Publication and Research LLP
Contact Us: journalijar@gmail.com

Peer Review History of the Manuscript

Title: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHACO-TRABECULECTOMY AND SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY TRABECULECTOMY IN 50 CATARACT PATIENTS

Peer Reviewers:

  • Reviewer First: Dr. Suman Kalyan Nath
  • Reviewer Second: Dr Aamina

Detailed Peer Review History

  1. Stage 1

    Initial Manuscript Submission

    • Manuscript Title: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHACO-TRABECULECTOMY AND SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY TRABECULECTOMY IN 50 CATARACT PATIENTS
    • File: Original File
    • Plagiarism Report: view report
      • Plagiarism Marks: 9 out of 10
    • Review Status: Assigned to Reviewer

  2. Stage 2

    Peer Review Reports

    • Reviewer 1: Dr. Suman Kalyan Nath
      • Reviewer Report File: Reviewer 1 Report
      • Average Peer Review Marks at Initial Stage: 5/10

        (Initial evaluation is based on scientific contribution, novelty, clarity, and methodology.)

      • Comments: TEXT

    • Reviewer 2: Dr Aamina
      • Reviewer Report File: Reviewer 2 Report
      • Average Peer Review Marks at Initial Stage: 9/10

        (Initial evaluation is based on scientific contribution, novelty, clarity, and methodology.)

      • Comments: TEXT

  3. Stage 3

    Author Revisions

    Comments:The authors have carefully addressed all the feedback provided by the reviewers, ensuring that necessary changes have been made to enhance the manuscript's quality. These revisions include improvements to the methodology, clarity, scientific rigor, and overall presentation of the manuscript. All suggestions and concerns raised by the reviewers have been thoroughly considered and incorporated. The updated manuscript now reflects these changes, ensuring that it meets the required standards for publication. The authors believe that these revisions have significantly improved the paper and have strengthened its contribution to the field.

  4. Stage 4

    Final Review by Editor

    • Editor's Comments: The final assessment confirms that the manuscript meets the journal's publication standards. Any necessary refinements have been addressed, ensuring the manuscript is ready for publication without further modifications..
    • Average Peer Review Marks at Publication Stage: 6/10

      Post-revision, the manuscript typically improves in clarity and scientific rigor.

  5. Stage 5

    Publication Stage

    • Status: Manuscript accepted for publication.
    • Copyright Report: Copyright Form or Agreement
      • Verification Status: Verified
    • Final Publication: Manuscript published and available for readers. The finalized version has been carefully reviewed and meets the journal's high standards for quality and academic integrity, making it accessible to the global research community.