Detailed Peer Review History of the Manuscript

Stage 1: Initial Manuscript Submission

• Manuscript Title: ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE SELECTION OF A DENTIFRICE AMONG A POPULATION OF ARTS AND COMMERCE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN WEST ZONE OF AHMEDABAD: A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY
• File: Original File
• Plagiarism Report: View Report
  • Plagiarism Marks: 7 out of 10
• Review Status: Assigned to Reviewer

Stage 2: Peer Review Reports

Stage 3: Author Revisions

Comments:The authors have carefully addressed all the feedback provided by the reviewers, ensuring that necessary changes have been made to enhance the manuscript's quality. These revisions include improvements to the methodology, clarity, scientific rigor, and overall presentation of the manuscript. All suggestions and concerns raised by the reviewers have been thoroughly considered and incorporated. The updated manuscript now reflects these changes, ensuring that it meets the required standards for publication. The authors believe that these revisions have significantly improved the paper and have strengthened its contribution to the field.

Stage 4: Final Review by Editor

• Editor's Comments: The final assessment confirms that the manuscript meets the journal's publication standards. Any necessary refinements have been addressed, ensuring the manuscript is ready for publication without further modifications.
• Average Peer Review Marks at Publication Stage: 8/10

  Post-revision, the manuscript typically improves in clarity and scientific rigor.

Stage 5: Publication Stage

• Status: Manuscript accepted for publication.
• Copyright Report: Copyright Form or Agreement
  • Verification Status: Verified
• Final Publication: Manuscript published and available for readers. The finalized version has been carefully reviewed and meets the journal's high standards for quality and academic integrity, making it accessible to the global research community.