EVALUATING THE MARGINAL DISCREPANCY AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF CAD - CAM MILLED VS 3D PRINTED PROVISIONAL CROWNS - AN INVITRO STUDY

Aims &Objectives: To evaluate Marginal discrepancy and Surface roughness of CAD-CAM Milled and 3D Printed provisional crowns after subjecting them to thermocycling.

Materials and Methods: A stainless-steel metal die with ANSI/ADA specifications had been fabricated for the study. It was scanned with an intraoral scanner and the data was sent to VHF S5M CAD CAM milling and R3Pro printing machine. A total of 10 samples Milled Group A(n=10) and 10 Printed Group B(n=10)  provisional crowns were fabricated from PMMA material using the scanned data. The temperatures for thermocycling are 37ºC and 60ºC. Each group is subdivided into two subgroups(n=5) based on thermocycling temperatures. The timeduration selected for Thermocycling was 7,14 and21 days. Marginal discrepancy was measured by using Stereomicroscope and Surface roughness was measured with Profilometer.

Results: Marginal discrepancy values were greater in CAD CAM milled crowns(141.47 µm) than in Printed crowns(109.87 µm) at 60ºC after a time-period of 21days.Surface roughness values were higher in Milled crowns(3.915µm) than in CAD CAM Printed crowns(3.817µm) at 60ºC for a given time duration of 21days. One-way ANOVA statistical analysis was done. The mean marginal gap of CAD CAM Milled crowns was statistically significant than Printed crowns(p>0.05).

Conclusion: Printed provisional restorationshad better Marginal accuracythan CAD CAM Milled provisional crowns. Surface roughness was higher in CAD CAM Milled crowns than in Printed provisional restorations.