12May 2020

STAKEHOLDERS ROLE IN ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS

  • Department of Education-Schools Division of Laguna, Liliw National High School, Evasco Road Kanlurang Bukal Liliw, Laguna.
  • Laguna State Polytechnic University, Santa Cruz Main Campus, Graduate Studies and Applied Research (GSAR) Bubukal, Santa Cruz, Laguna.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This study aimed to determine the presence and involvement of the stakeholders and its relationship in organizational development and school effectiveness. This study employed the descriptive correlational survey research design that involved three hundred fifty-nine (359) school heads, teachers and stakeholders from the twenty (20) districts of the Division of Laguna.The findings showed the presence of different stakeholders were sometimes present. Often involvement in planning, generating resources, program/project implementation, monitoring and evaluation in the part of stakeholders was revealed. Achieved organizational organization, comprehensive strategic planning, effective organizational structure, strong management, well developed leadership capacity and robust human resource capacity as indicators to determine the level of organizational development marked often observed. Moreover, school effectiveness based on effective instructional leadership, positive school climate, strong professional development and intensified clients satisfaction implies highly practiced.Presence and involvement of stakeholders found to have a significant relationship in the organizational development and school effectiveness. It is recommended that school leaders should develop strategic techniques to involve stakeholders in school administration, management and supervision, school heads should strengthen the importance of shared responsibility and accountability among stakeholders, the top-level officials should tightly monitor if the schools strictly adhere to the existing policies with regards to stakeholders engagement and lastly, school leaders should secure organizational development and school effectiveness at all times and they must involve stakeholders.

  1. Aitken, N. D. (2012). College student performance, satisfaction and retention. Journal of Higher Education, 53, 32-50.
  2. Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., &Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333, 1034?1037.
  3. Allison, M. & Kaye, J. (2017). Strategic Planning for Nonprofit Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  4. Beyerlein, M. (2013). Team-based organization: Creating an environment for team success. In M. West, K. Smith, & D. Tjosvold (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working, West Sussex, England: Wiley
  5. Coulter, M. K., & Coulter, M. K. (2010). Strategic management in action (p. 7). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  6. Germain R., (2016), Role of Context and Structure in Radical and Incremental Logistic Innovation Adoption, ?Journal of Business Research?, 35.
  7. Higgins-DAlessandro, A. (2011). The second side of the educational coin: Prosocial development. In P. M. Brown, M. W. Corrigan, & A. Higgins-DAlessandro (Eds.), The handbook of prosocial education (pp. 3?38). Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing Group.
  8. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker, J. M. T., Reed. R. P. DeJong, J. M. & Jones, K. C. (2011) Parental involvement in Homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), pp 195-209
  9. Mark, M. M., &Shotland, R. I. (2015). Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgements: The role of perceived power and legitimacy in the selection stakeholder groups. Evaluation Review, 9, 605-626.
  10. Mokoena, S. (2012). Effective Participative Management: Does It Affect Trust Levels of Stakeholders in Schools? J Soc Sci, 30(1), 43-53.
  11. Mondy, R. W. (2009), Human Resource Management, 10th edition. Prentice Hall New Delhi.
  12. Msila, V. (2014). Teacher Unionism and School Management: A Study of (Eastern Cape) Schools in South Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(2), 259-274.
  13. Neumerski, Ch. M. (2013). Rethinking Instructional Leadership, a Review: What do we know about Principal, Teacher and Coach Instructional Leadership and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 310-347. doi:10.1177/0013161X12456700
  14. Robbins, S. P. (2014) Organizational behavior 11th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  15. Rosario, J.G. (2010). On the leading edge: Critical Success Factors in PROJECTS implementation. Journal of project management. 4 (3).
  16. Sheldon, J. D. &Mahitivanichcha, K. (2012).? Redefining parental involvement: lessons from high performing migrant-impacted schools. American Education Research Journal, 38(2): 253-288
  17. Singapore Ministry of Education (2013). Stakeholders in Education. Ministry of Education, Singapore.
  18. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2013). Becoming a trustworthy leader. In the Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership (3rd ed.) (pp. 40-54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[Jerome S. Monfero Ed. D (2020); STAKEHOLDERS ROLE IN ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS Int. J. of Adv. Res. 8 (May). 597-608] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

JEROME S. MONFERO, ED. D.
LILIW NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL/ LAGUNA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY-MAIN CAMPUS

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10965      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10965

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 61 | No. of Views: 244