15Jun 2019

INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, CORPORATE PERFORMANCE AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AS MODERATING VARIABLE.

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Agency theory is a theory that explains the relationship between principal and agent in business. The main concern of this theory lies in how to solve problems that arise from agency relationships because of the inconsistency of objectives or differences in the assessment of a business risk. This problem can arise when the agent is motivated to take an action for his interests which is contrary to what he should have done or expected by the principal. This situation is commonly called moral hazard. Intellectual capital can reduce conflict because smart people may not necessarily increase the value of the company. But in reality high intellectual capital can cause high fraud and consequently make the company's performance not good. Therefore, corporate governance is needed to be able to report and monitor transparency carried out by intellectual capital and can reduce the occurrence of moral hazard. This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of intellectual capital on corporate performance and to examine and analyze the effect of corporate governance on the relationship between intellectual capital and corporate performance. This research is a type of research with hypotheses, using quantitative approaches and secondary data taken from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population used in this study are companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) according to the criteria of the study sample. The results showed that the intellectual capital variable with firm performance had a positive effect while the intellectual capital and corporate governance variables as moderating variables on firm performance had no effect. For size and der control variables there is a positive influence on company performance.

  1. (2000). Sulitnya Mengkuantifikasi Modal Intelektual. Media Akuntansi, Oktober, 45-48.
  2. Bontis, Nick (1998). ?Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study that DevelopsMeasures and Models.? Management Decision 36 No. 2, hal 63-76.
  3. Chen, et al. (2005).? An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms? market value and financial performance.? Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 6 No. 2, hal. 159-176.
  4. Fahmi, Irham. (2012). ?Analisis Kinerja Keuangan?, cetakan ke-2 Bandung: Alfabeta
  5. Fauzia, N., dan Amanah, L. (2016). Pengaruh intellectual capital, karakteristik perusahaan, dan corporate social responsibility terhadap nilai perusahaan.?Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi,?5(4).
  6. Ghozali, Imam (2011). ?Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Program IBM SPSS 19.? Edisi 5. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
  7. Johnson, L. (2011). Law and legal theory in the history of corporate responsibility: corporate personhood.?Seattle UL Rev.,?35, 1135.
  8. Juniarti, J. (2013). Good Corporate Governance and Predicting Financial Distress Using Logistic and Probit Regression Model.?Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan,?15(1), 43-50.
  9. Kustono, A. S. (2009). Pengaruh Ukuran, Deviden Payout, Risiko Spesifik, dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan terhadap Praktik Perataan Laba pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Studi Empiris Bursa Efek Jakarta 2002?2006.?Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis,?14(3), 200-205.
  10. Khalique, M., et al. (2011). Role of intellectual capital on the organizational performance of electrical and electronic SMEs in Pakistan.
  11. Newell, R. and Wilson, G. (2002). Premium for Good Corporate Governance. The Mc Kinsey Quarterly.
  12. Petty, et al. (2000). ?Intellectual capital literature review: Measurement, reporting and management.? Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 1 No. 2, hal. 155-76.
  13. Prasetyanto, P. (2013). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan dan Kinerja Intellectual Capital Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Skripsi. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
  14. Primadanti, D., & Eko, U. P. (2013). Pengaruh Size, Leverage, dan Growth Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Pada Sektor Keuangan Yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2008-2011.
  15. Safieddine, A., (2009), ?Islamic Financial Institutions and Corporate Governance: New Insights for Agency Theory?, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol 17, N?2, p.p. 142?158.
  16. Sayyidah,U. (2017). ?Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Profitabilitas Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Property Dan Real Estate Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2015). Vol 46, No. 1
  17. Sawarjuwono, Tjiptohadi dan Agustine Prihatin Kadir (2003). ?Intellectual Capital: Perlakuan, Pengukuran, dan Pelaporan (Sebuah Library Research).? Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. 5 No. 1, hal. 35-57.
  18. (2003). Penilaian Kinerja Keuangan, FE Universitas Sumatera Utara.
  19. Sudana, I Made. (2009). Manajemen Keuangan:Teori dan Praktek. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
  20. Widiyaningrum, A. (2004). Modal intelektual. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 1, 16-25.
  21. Windah, G. C., & Andono, F. A. (2013). Pengaruh penerapan corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan hasil survei the Indonesian Institute Perception Governance (IICG) periode 2008-2011.?Calyptra,?2(1), 1-20.
 

[Ivon Cecilia Rompas,Victor Soeindra and Yanuar Dananjaya. (2019); INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, CORPORATE PERFORMANCE AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AS MODERATING VARIABLE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Jun). 497-505] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Yanuar Dananjaya
Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9249      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9249

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 90 | No. of Views: 193