22May 2019

LEVEL OF TEACHERS CAPABILITY IN MEETING THE NEW GEC REQUIREMENTS OF CHED: INPUT TO PROPOSED TEACHERS CAPABILITY TRAINING.

  • Faculty, College of Teacher Education Laguna State Polytechnic University Santa Cruz, Laguna, Philippines.
  • Abstract
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This study entitled ?Level of Teachers Capability to meet the new GEC requirements of CHED: input to proposed teachers capability training? aimed to find out the effect of Teachers Capability on the Implementation of New GEC Curriculum to the teachers of selected higher educational institutions in the province of Laguna provide an insight on how to implement the GEC curriculum. Thus, this study determined answer to the following: Specifically, it sought answers to the following questions: 1. What is the level of teacher?s competence of higher educational institutions towards the implementation of new general education curriculum in terms of CHED Seminar, Leadership, and Planning? 2. What is the level of implementation of new general education curriculum when it comes to Monitoring, Coaching, Review; and Evaluation? 3. Is there any significant impact of teacher?s competence of higher educational institutions towards the implementation of new general curriculum? The researcher made use of the descriptive method of research in order to elicit relevant information about Teachers Competence of Higher Education Institutions toward the Implementation of New General Curriculum. The statistical tools used were weighted mean, standard deviation, and one-way ANOVA. The statistical treatment of data revealed the following findings. The level of teacher?s competence in terms of CHEDseminar got the total weighted mean of 3.23 and was interpreted as ?sometimes? while in terms of leadership got the total weighted mean of 4.48 and was interpreted as ?always? while in terms of planning got the total weighted mean of 4.36and was interpreted as ?always?. The level of implementation of new general education curriculum in terms of monitoring got a mean value of 4.08 and was interpreted as ?often? while in terms of coaching got the total weighted mean of 4.26 and was interpreted as ?always? while in terms of review got the total weighted mean of 4.09 and was verbally interpreted as ?Often? while in terms of evaluation got a mean value of 4.17 and verbally interpreted as ?often?. The impact of teacher?s capability in terms of implementation of new GEC curriculum. It further shows that impact has F of 12.36 and F- critical of 2.12 which is less than the level of significance a= 0.05 verbally interpreted as ?Significant?.The findings to this study suggest that Teachers Competence bears a significant relationship with the Implementation of New GEC curriculum. The level of teacher?s capability in terms of CHED Seminar, leadership and planning was marked as significant to the implementation of new GEC curriculum in terms of monitoring, coaching, review, and evaluation to which the study has suggested special encouragement by all personnel involved with the group. More investigations of this kind should be conducted to foster international exchange of ideas, research findings, and intercultural dialogue.


  1. Allinder, R. M., (2014).. Effects of teacher self-monitoring on implementation of curriculum ? based measurement and mathematics computationachievement of students with disabilities. Journal of the Hammil Institute??????????? on Disabilities.
  2. OECD (2013). OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (School Resource Review): Design and Implementation Plan for the Review, OECD PublishingBenito ? Corre, Juanita (2013). Decision- making practices of the schoolprincipals in selected basic education private schools in CALABARZON basis for a guide in decision ? making for school administrators.Falogne, Jose (2012). Assessment of public secondary school principals?? management functions and student services in a division: basis for the development of a handbook. Doctor of philosophy in education university: Phillippine Normal University, Philippines.
  3. Ferran Cullo, Jean B. Mabunga, Shahanie F, Magada, Imee M. Magada (2012). Management fuctions in relation to performance of barangay committees in the municipality of Romblon, Romblo. Romblon State University, Odiongan Romblon
  4. Mushtaq, Muhammad. (2014). Analysis of management structures of private sectorschool in Punjab. Master?s thesis, University, Abraka, Nigeria,
  5. Palattao, Edgardo Bitanga (2013). Public secondary schools: an inquiry on the instructional readiness and management of grade 7 mathematics curriculum. Arellano Uniiversity.
  6. Alcober Neil (2008). CHED to Implement new curriculum Retrieved from.https://www.manilatimes.net/ched-to-implement-new-curriculum
  7. Les Beli (2009). Strategic planning and school management: full of sound and fury, signifying nothing? Inaugural lecture given Tuesday, 19th february 2009.

[Caezar D. Pamin, Ph. D. (2019); LEVEL OF TEACHERS CAPABILITY IN MEETING THE NEW GEC REQUIREMENTS OF CHED: INPUT TO PROPOSED TEACHERS CAPABILITY TRAINING. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (May). 718-730] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Caezar D. Pamin, Ph. D.
Professor, Laguna State Polytechnic University, Santa Cruz, Laguna, Philippines

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9093      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9093