08May 2019

THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLE, INDIVIDUAL CAPABILITY, AND MOTIVATION ON AUDITOR PERFORMANCE WITH REWARD AS THE MODERATING VARIABLE.

  • Magister of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
  • Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This study aims to provide a review of the effect of Leadership Style, Individual Capability, and Motivation on Auditor Performance and reward as a moderating variable. The object of the research is the auditor of the Regional Inspectorate of the Provincial Government of South Sulawesi. The population is 55 auditors. The sample technique used is the census method, which is a study that uses all members of the population to be sampled, so the number of samples is 55 respondents. Retrieving data using a questionnaire by analyzing data using moderated regression analysis (MRA) using SPSS version 22. The results of the study show that: First, the leadership style has a positive and significant influence on the auditor's performance. Second, individual capabilities have a positive and significant effect on auditor performance. Third, motivation has a positive and significant effect on auditor performance. Fourth, rewards moderate the relationship of leadership style, individual capability, and motivation to auditor performance.

  1. Akbar, MochNizar. 2015. Pengaruhindependensidanprofesionalismeterhadapkinerja auditor. JurnalekonomidanbisnisVol 3 No 2
  2. Allen, N. J., dan Meyer, J.P, 2007, The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to The Organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
  3. Arens, Alvin A., Elder, dan Beasley. 2008. Auditing danjasa assurance pendekatanterintegrasijilid? Edisi 12. Jakarta : Erlangga
  4. Arumsari, AdeliaLukyta, danBudiartha,? I Ketut.? ? PengaruhProfesionalisme? Auditor, EtikaProfesi, BudayaOrganisasi, dan Gaya KepemirnpinanTerhadapKinerja Auditor Pada Kantor AkuntanPublik Di Bali. E JurnalEkonomidanBisnisUniversitasUdayana Volume 5 Nomor? 8, Hal 2297 -2304
  5. Alshbeil, Seif Obeid dan Al-Zeaud, Hussein Ali. 2012. Management support and its impact on performance of internal auditorsatjordanianpublic industrial shareholding companies. Global journal of international business research vol 5 no 5.
  6. Ayuningtyas, HarvitaYulian, danSugengPamudji. 2012. Pengaruhpengalamankerja,Independensi, Obyektifitas, IntegritasdanKompetensiterhadapkualitashasil audit. Diponegoto Journal Of Accounting. Vol 1 No 2.
  7. Azhar, Al. 2013. Pengaruhkonflikperan, ketidakjelasanperan, kesanketidakpastianlingkungan, locus of control danmotivasikerjaterhadapkinerja auditor studiempirispadakantorakuntan public di pekanbaru, padangdanbatam., jumalekonomi, universitasriaukampusbinawidya volume 21, nomor 4
  8. Bangun, Wilson. 2012. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia. Jakarta. Erlangga
  9. Danang, Sunyoto. 2013. Metodologipenelitianakuntansi. Bandung : PT RefikaAditamaAnggotaIkapi
  10. Dessler, Gary, 2009, ManajemenSOM :Buku 1. Jakarta : Indeks
  11. Djamarah, SyaifulBahri. 2008. PsikologiBelajar, Jakarta : RinekaCipta
  12. Ganesan, Shankar dan Barton A. Weitz, 1996. The Impact of Staffing Policies on Retail Buyer Job Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of betailing.
  13. Ghozali, Imam. 2011. AplikasiAnalisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang. BadanPenerbitUniversitasDiponegoro.
  14. Gibson, James, L. 2000. Organization, Behavior, Structure, Process, Edition
  15. Hariandja, Marihot. T.E. 2009. ManajemenSumberDayaManusiaPengadaan, Pengembangan, Pengkompensasian, clan PeningkatanProduktivitasPegawai. Jakarta : PT BumiAksara.
  16. Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2016. EdisiRevisi. Jakarta :Penerbit PT BumiAksara.
  17. Julianingtyas, BungaNur. 2012. Pengaruh locus of control, gayakepemimpinan, dankomitmenorganisasiterhadapkinerja auditor. UniversitasNegeri Semarang. Accounting Analysis Journal 1 Nomor 1, 2012.
  18. Kurniawan, DwiSumartonoAgung, Nadirsyah, danSyukriy Abdullah. Pengaruhindependensi auditor, integritas auditor, profesionalisme auditor, etikaprofesi, dangayakepemimpinanterhadapkinerja auditor di BPK Perwakilan Kota Aceh. UniversitasSyiah Kuala. Aceh. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Volume 6 Nomor 3, hal 49-57.
  19. Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2014. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia Perusahaan. Cetakanpertama. Penerbit :RemajaRosdakarya, Bandung.
  20. Marita, danGultom, YossyPurnama Sari. 2018. PengaruhProfesionalisme, EtikaProfesi, Independensi, MotivasidanKomitmenOrganisasiTerhadapKinerja Auditor Internal (StudiKasusPada PT Perkebunan Nusantara IV Medan). Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta. Jurnalpenelitianekonomidanakuntansi, volume III Nomor 1
  21. Mayo, Andrew. 2000. The Role of Employee Development in the Growth of Intellectual Capital, Personal Review. Vol. 29 No 4, 2000, pp 521-533.
  22. 2012.Pengukurankinerjaberbasiskompetensi. Jakarta : Raja GrafindoPersada. [36] Moerhad, Griffin. 2013. PerilakuOrganisasi :ManajemenSumberDayaManusiadanOrganisasi. :Edisi 9. Jakarta. Salembaempat
  23. Mitchell, Vance F &PravinMondgill. 1967. Organizational Behavior and Measurement of Maslow' s Needs Hierarchy.
  24. Mulyadi, 2008. Sistemakuntansi, Jakarta :SalembaEmpat.
  25. Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B. and Wright, P,M. (2008). Human Resource Management : Gaining a Competitive Advantage, New York : Mcgraw Hill.
  26. 2012. PengaruhKepemimpinanTerhadapBudayaOrganisasi, KomitmenKerja, PerilakuKerja, danKinerjaPegawai (StudiPadaSatuanKerjaPerangkat Daerah Propinsi Sulawesi Tenggara). JurnalAplikasiManajemen, Vol 10 No 1
  27. Ongkorohardjo, M.D.P.A, A SusantodanRachmawati, 2008. Analisispengaruh Human Capital TerhadapKinerja Perusahaan (StudiEmpirispada Kantor AkuntanPublik di Indonesia). JurnalAkuntansidanKeuangan, Vol l. 10, No l
  28. Panjaitan, Anton danJatmiko, Bambang. 2014. PengaruhMotivasi, Stress, danRekanKerjaTerhadapKinerja Auditor (StudiEmpirisPada Kantor AkuntanPublik di DKI Jakarta). JurnalBisnisdanEkonomi, Volume 5 Nomor I
  29. Permana, Yockie. 2016. Anal isispengaruhmotivasi, stress, danrekankerjaterhadapkinerja auditor di kantorbadanpengawaskeuangandanpembangunanriaudansumaterautara.
  30. Robbins SP, dan Judge. 2008. PerilakuorganisasiBuku 2, Jakarta :SalembaEmpat. Hal 256. [51]????????? . 2015. PerilakuorganisasiBuku 2, Jakarta : SalembaEmpat
  31. 2018. Pengaruhindependensidangayakepemimpinanterhadapkinerja Auditor (studipadabadanpengawasankeuangandanpembangunandaerahprovinsipapua). UniversitasCendrawasih. JurnalAkuntansidankeuangandaerah. Volume 13 Nomor 2.
  32. Sawyer, Lawrence B. 2009. Internal Auditing. BukuSatu. Edisi Lima. Jakarta : SalembaEmpatSingarimbun, MasridanSofyanEfffendy, 1995, MetodePenelitian Survey, EdisiRevisi, PT Pustaka LP3ES, Jakarta
  33. Suartana, I Wayan. 2010, "AkuntansiKeperilakuanTeoridanlmplementasi". Yogyakarta :PenerbitAndi.
  34. Sudibyo, Yvonne Agustine. Pengaruh? Human? Capital TerhadapKinerja Auditor? (StudiEmpirispada? Kantor? AkuntanPublik? di? Jakarta.? Jurnal? MediaRisetAkuntansi,? Auditing &lnformasi, Vol 14, No. 2. Agustus. 2014
  35. Supriatna, Nono. 2014. Pengaruh Human Capital terhadapKinerja Auditor pada KAP yang ada di Bandung. JumalRisetAkuntansidanKeuangan, Vol. 2, No. 1. 251-260.
  36. Thoha, Miftah. 2010. Kepemimpinandalammanajemen. Jakarta :Rajawali Pers.
  37. Trisnaningsih, Sri. 2007. Independensi Auditor Dan KomitmenOrganisasiSebagaiMediasiPengaruhPemahaman Good Governance, Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan BudayaOrganisasiTerhadapKinerja Auditor. UniversitasHasanuddin. JurnalPenelitian . Volume 10. Hal 1-56.
  38. Widhi, SaputraNugrohodanSetyawati,?? ?? 2015.?? PengaruhIndependensi,???????? Gaya Kepemimpinan, KomitmenOrganisasi, danPemahaman Good Corporate? Governance TerhadapKinerja Auditor Pemerintah (StudiEmpirisPada BP.KP PerwakilanJawa Tengah). UniversitasMuhammadiyah Surakarta. JurnalManajemendanBisnis Volume 19, Nomor 1, 2015, Hal 64 ? 79
  39. Yukl, Gary. 2010. Kepemimpinandalamorganisasi, EdisiKelima. Jakarta.PT lndeks.

[Siti Nur Reskiyawati Said, Andi Kusumawati And Sabir. (2019); THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLE, INDIVIDUAL CAPABILITY, AND MOTIVATION ON AUDITOR PERFORMANCE WITH REWARD AS THE MODERATING VARIABLE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (May). 249-260] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Siti Nur Reskiyawati Said
Hasanuddin University

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9030      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9030

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 49 | No. of Views: 112