05Apr 2019

CLINICAL AND ANGIOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WITH NONOBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERIES (MINOCA).

  • Professor , Dept. of Cardiology, S.C.B.Medical College. Cuttack, Odisha, India.
  • Senior Resident, Dept. of Cardiology, S.C.B.Medical College. Cuttack, Odisha, India.
  • Asso. Professor , Dept. of Cardiology, S.C.B.Medical College. Cuttack, Odisha, India.
  • Asst.Professor , Dept. of Cardiology, S.C.B.Medical College. Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Background: Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) remains a challenge in the clinical practice. Objective: This study has been designed to evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, clinical and angiographic profile of patients with MINOCA. Methods: Two seventy four consecutive patients with Acute Myocardial infarction got admitted during the period Between March 2017- February 2019 were included in the study .They were classified in to MINOCA and MICAD group and their demographic, clinical, laboratory parameters, and angiographic features were compared. Result: Twenty-Five of 274 patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI) were classified as MINOCA (prevalence 9.1%). Patients with MINOCA were younger (46.1 vs 52.4 years, p <0.001) and the proportion of women was higher (42.5% vs 18.7%, p =0.03) than the obstructive group. The MINOCA group had less cardiovascular risk factors (Diabetes 19.3% vs 31.1%, Hypertension 17.3% vs 37.7% and smoking 45.3% vs 61.3%). The presence of ST elevation MI was less (23.0% vs 47.9%) among MINOCA group. The prevalence of risk factors like dyslipidemia (36% vs 38.7%), obesity(8.0% vs 9.5%),family history of CAD (8.0% vs 8.0%) and presence of peripheral artery disease (4.0% vs 1.0%)were similar in both the groups. Angiographic findings among the MINOCA group were recanalised and minimal CAD in 50.6%, normal coronaries in 24%, slow flow in 12% , coronary spasm in 5.3%. Myocardial bridging, coronary anomalies and coronary thrombus contributed 2.7% each. Conclusions: MINOCA was more common in younger age group, females and patients with NSTEMI. Cardiovascular risk factors like Diabetes , Hypertension and smoking were less prevalent in MINOCA group and risk factors like dyslipidemia, obesity, family history of CAD and presence of Peripheral artery disease were similar in both the groups. In coronary angiography Recanalised and minimally obstructive lesion was found to be the commonest one followed by normal coronaries in MINOCA patients.


  1. Gross H, Sternberg WH.?Myocardial infarction without significant lesions of coronary arteries.?Arch Intern Med. 1939;64:249?267.
  2. Beltrame JF.?Assessing patients with myocardial infarction and non‐obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA).?J Intern Med. 2013;273:182?185.
  3. Agewall S, Beltrame JF, Reynolds HR,et al;?ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non‐obstructive coronary arteries.?Eur Heart J. 2017;38:143?153.
  4. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.?J Am Coll Cardiol.2012;60:1581-1598.
  5. Pasupathy S et al, Systematic Review of Patients Presenting With Suspected Myocardial Infarction and Nonobstructive Coronary Circulation. 2015;131 :861-870.
  6. Pasupathy S, Tavella R etaI, The What, When, Who, Why, How and Where of Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA), Circulation Journal. 2016; 80:11-16.
  7. Beigel R etaI, Prognostic Implications of Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease 111 Patients Undergoing Coronary Computed. Tomographic Angiography for Acute Chest Pain, Am J Cardiol 2013; 111 :941-945.
  8. Beigel R, SellaBrosh S et al, The significance of non-obstructive coronary artery disease upon multi-detector computed tomography in patients presenting with acute chest pain, JACC 2012; 59(13): 1367-
  9. Segev A, Beigel R et aI, Non-obstructive coronary artery disease upon multi-detector computed tomography in patients presenting with acute chest pain-Results of an intermediate term follow-up, European Heart Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2012; 13: 169-173.
  10. Javier LopezPais,?Barbara?Izquierdo et al,incidence, clinical profile and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries in the real world, JACC?Mar 2017,?69?(11 Supplement)?142;?DOI:1016/S0735-1097(17)33531-3
  11. Montenegro Sa F,?Ruivo C et al ,Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: a single-center retrospective study, Coron Artery Dis.2018 Sep;29(6):511-515.
  12. Iqbal MN, Rao M, et al. Non obstructive coronary artery disease in patients admitted for elective coronary angiography. Pak J Med Sci 2014;30(6): 1336-1340.
  13. Ramanath V S, Armstrong D F etaI, Receipt of Cardiac Medications Upon Discharge Among Men and Women With Acute Coronary And Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease, Clin. Cardiol.2010; 33, 1 :36-41.

[Routray S. N., Tripathy S. K., Satpathy C., Mohanty N.K. and Dash B.K.. (2019); CLINICAL AND ANGIOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WITH NONOBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERIES (MINOCA). Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Apr). 612-617] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Prof. Dr. Satyanarayan Routray
HOD, Dept. of Cardiology, S.C.B.Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, india

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8858      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8858