06Mar 2019

EVALUATION OF THE Q WAVE BY COMPARISON WITH THE RESULTS OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND CMR AND ANGIOGRAPHY.

  • Cardiology B service; Ibn Sina Hospital Center, Rabat-Morocco.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Background:Q waves on the electrocardiogram are often considered to be reflective of irreversibly scarred Myocardium due to antecedent transmural myocardial infarction. However, there are some indications that residual viable tissue may be present in Q wave infracted regions. It is clinically relevant to know how many Q-wave regions contain viable tissue because these patients may benefit from revascularization in terms of improvement of function and long-term survival. A technical advance in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has significantly improved image quality. We investigated whether healed myocardial infarction can be visualized as hyper enhanced regions with this new technique, and whether assessment of the transmural extent of infarction yields new physiological data. Methods:100 MRI examinations were carried out in two groups: patients with Q wave and patients without Q wave at the electrocardiogram. Patients with healed myocardial infarction were prospectively enrolled after enyzmatically proven necrosis and imaged by the echocardiography. The MRI procedure used a segmented inversion-recovery gradient-echo sequence after gadolinium administration. Findings were compared with those of coronary angiography, electrocardiography, cine MRI, and Echocardiography. Results:The mean age of patients with cardiac MRI was 57.9 ? 12.9 years, with extremes of 28 and 85 years. A male predominance with 56 men (56%) and 44 women (44%) is a sex ratio of 1.3. One or more cardiovascular risk factors were found in 86 patients (86%). Thirteen patients (13%) were coronary patients known or followed for effort angina, And finally 5 patients (5%) had a field of coronary heredity. 47 patients had NYHA Stage II or III Dyspnea (47%) and worsened to become NYHA Stage IV in 20 patients (20%) with Paroxysmal Night Dyspnea in 27 patients (27%). ) and an orthopnea in 26 patients (26%).78 patients had chest pain (78%), 14% of patients had palpitations (n = 14); The delay between onset of symptoms of our patients and their hospitalizations varied between the same day and 180 days with an average of 24 days +/- 36 days and a median of 7 days and this can be explained by the variety of clinical presentation between Acute chest pain that pushes the patient consulted on the field and a flare of heart failure that settles gradually. The initial clinical evaluation shows that the patients were all aware, with a GCS at 15; The signs of right heart failure were present in 20% of cases, Crackling Rails in 29% of cases. Chest x-ray: 30% of patients (n = 30) already had cardiomegaly. The electrocardiogram show Q Wave in 42% of cases (n = 42), The result of Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance was compared between the two group of patient (Q wave and non Q wave) The results of our comparison were significant between the two group of patient with P <0.05 in most times which indirectly means that the presence of a Q wave corresponds to more akinesia on MRI and echocardiography. Coronarography was performed in 73% of patients (n = 73), Although the presence of a Q wave at the ECG corresponds to more occlusion at the coronarography, the comparison was not statistically significant, and this can be explained either by coronary reperfusion or by the presence of collaterality or following MINOCA? The CMR was able to detect sequelae of necrosis in 81% (n = 81) of cases, of which 34% (n = 34) was viable vs. 47% (n=47) not viable. Finally we deduce that the presence of necrosis Q wave corresponds to more necrosis in echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, but despite this the territory remains viable in 42% of cases. And the results are statistically significant. The comparison of different methods of exploration respectively to coronary angiography showed statistically significant results, as far as the ECG and the ETT are concerned, it means that the 2 methods can miss the affected territories, on the other hand the MRI despite the difference in outcome with coronary angiography but the statistic was not significant, and this can be explained by the number of coronary angiography performed that was less than MRI and the ability of MRI to detect non visible lesions at the coronarography to see MINOCA whose number in our series was not negligible. Conclusions:Chronic Q waves on electrocardiography do not exclude the presence of viable myocardium; in 38% of the Q-wave regions in 55 patients, viable tissue was present. Thus patients with a previous Q-wave infarction, severely depressed left ventricular function, and heart failure should be referred for viability testing.


  1. Kannel WB, Abbott RD. Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction: an update on the Framingham study. N Engl J
  2. Med 1984; 311: 1144?47.
  3. Nadelmann J, Frishman WH, Ooi WL, et al. Prevalence, incidence and prognosis of recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction in persons aged 75 years or older: the Bronx Aging Study. Am J Cardiol1990; 66: 533?37.
  4. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS, Dalen JE. Non-Q wave myocardial infarction: recent changes in occurrence and prognosis?a community-wide perspective. Am Heart J 1987; 113: 273?79. 4 Nicod P, Gilpin E, Dittrich H, et al. Short- and long-term clinical outcome after Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in a large patient population. Circulation 1989; 79: 528?36.
  5. Lima JA, Judd RM, Bazille A, Schulman SP, Atalar E, Zerhouni EA. Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms. Circulation1995; 92: 1117?25.
  6. Simonetti O, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MRI technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology (in press).Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. (Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, andcontractile function). Circulation 1999; 100: 1992?2002.
  7. Ficno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Contrast enhanced MRI of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am CollCardiol2000; 36: 1985?91.
  8. La Canna G, Rahimtoola SH, Visioli O, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracies of non-invasive tests, singly and in combination, for diagnosis of hibernating myocardium. Eur Heart J 2000;21:1358-67.
  9. Cwajg JM, Cwajg E, Nagueh SF, et al. End-diastolic wall thickness as a predictor of recovery of function in myocardial hibernation: relation to rest-redistribution Tl-201 tomography and dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am CollCardiol 2000;35:1152-61.
  10. Baer FM, Theissen P, Schneider CA, et al. Dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging predicts contractile recovery of chronically dysfunctional myocardium after successful revascularization. J Am CollCardiol 1998;31:1040-8.
  11. Bax JJ, Wijns W, Cornel JH, et al. Accuracy of currently available techniques for prediction of functional recovery after revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic coronary artery disease: comparison of pooled data. J Am CollCardiol 1997;30:1451-60.
  12. Pasquet A, Robert A, D?Hondt AM, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial ischemia and viability in patients with chronic left ventricular ischemic dysfunction. Circulation 1999;100:141-8.
  13. Cigarroa CG, deFilippi CR, Brickner E, et al. Dobutamine stress echocardiography identifies hibernating myocardium and predictsrecovery of left ventricular function after coronary revascularization. Circulation 1993;88:430-6.
  14. La Canna G, Alfieri O, Guibbini R, et al. Echocardiography during infusion of dobutamine for identification of reversible dysfunction in patients with c coronary artery disease. J Am CollCardiol 1994;23:617-26.

[Y.Kettani, S.Hallab, N.Doghmi and M.Cherti. (2019); EVALUATION OF THE Q WAVE BY COMPARISON WITH THE RESULTS OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND CMR AND ANGIOGRAPHY. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Mar). 506-514] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


YOUNESS KETTANI
Author

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8664      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8664