27Mar 2019

OPTIMIZATION OF IN VITRO ADVENTITIOUS SHOOT INDUCTION IN JATROPHA CURCAS BY RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY.

  • Centro de Investigacion y Asistencia en Tecnologia y Diseno del Estado de Jalisco, A.C., Sede Sureste, Carretera Sierra Papacal-Chuburna Puerto Km. 5, 97302 Sierra Papacal, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.
  • Instituto de Biotecnolog?a y Ecolog?a. Universidad Veracruzana, Campus para la Cultura, las Artes y el Deporte, 91001 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Jatrophacurcas is a second generation biofuel crop that is also an important biological resource. Meeting increasing biofuel demand requires wider cultivation of specialized varieties, highlighting the need for massive culture techniques such as in vitro micropropagation. Key stages in plant tissue culture processes, such as adventitious shoot induction, can be optimized to increase micropropagation protocol efficiency. Response surface methodology, a statistical tool for this purpose, was applied to optimize in vitro induction of adventitious shoots in the J. curcasmicropropagation process. A preliminary assay was done in which 6-(?, ?-dimethylallylamino) purine and indolacetic acid were selected as the factors to optimize. A 22 central composite design with four central points was then applied to fit it to a second grade model and a rotatable design applied to produce the final model and surface graphics. Focused on maximum point, the surface model design identified maximum adventitious shoot induction to be 21 shoots per explant in Murashige and Skoog medium at 75% ionic strength and containing 83.3 ?M 6-(?, ?-dimethylallylamino) purine and 1.3 ?M indolacetic acid. This is the first report in which response surface methodology was found to be an effective statistical technique for optimizing adventitious shoot induction in Jatrophacurcas.

  1. Abbasi, Z., Hooshyar, S., Bagherieh-Najjar, M. B. (2016): Improvement of callus production and shoot regeneration using various organs of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) by response surface methodology. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 52:537-545.
  2. Anderson, M.J., Whitcomb, P. J. (2016): RSM simplified: optimizing processes using response surface methods for design of experiments. Productivity Press. Miami, Florida, pp 53-63.
  3. Bezerra, M. A., Santelli, R. E., Oliveira, E. P., Villar, L.S., Escaleira, L. A. (2008): Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76:965-977.
  4. Box, G. E., Wilson, K. B. (1992): On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. In Breakthroughs in Statistics, Springer, New York, pp 270-310.
  5. Chakraborty, D., Bandyopadhyay, A., Bandopadhyay, S., Gupta, K., Chatterjee, A. (2010): Use of response surface methodology for optimization of a shoot regeneration protocol in Basilicumpolystachyon. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 46:451-459.
  6. Coenen, C., Lomax, T. L. (1997): Auxin-cytokinin interactions in higher plants: old problems and new tools. Trends in Plant Science 2:351-356.
  7. Datta, M. M., Mukherjee, P., Ghosh, B., Jha, T. B. (2007): In vitro clonal propagation of biodiesel plant (Jatrophacurcas L.). Current Science 93:1438-1442.
  8. Davies, P. J. (2010): The plant hormones: their nature, occurrence, and functions. In: Plant hormones, Springer, Dordrecht pp 1-15.
  9. Diaz‐Sala, C., Hutchison, K. W., Goldfarb, B., Greenwood, M. S. (1996): Maturation‐related loss in rooting competence by loblolly pine stem cuttings: The role of auxin transport, metabolism and tissue sensitivity. PhysiologiaPlantarum 97:481-490.
  10. G?mez-Montes, E. O., Oliver-Salvador, C., Dur?n-Figueroa, N., Badillo-Corona, J. A., Salas, C. E. (2015): Optimization of direct shoot regeneration using cotyledonary explants and true leaves from lettuce cv. Romaine (Lactuca sativa L.) by surface response methodology. Plant Growth Regulation 77:327-334.
  11. Guan, X., Yao, H. (2008): Optimization of Viscozyme L-assisted extraction of oat bran protein using response surface methodology. Food Chemistry 106:345-351.
  12. Hand, C., Maki, S., Reed, B. M. (2014): Modeling optimal mineral nutrition for hazelnut micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 119:411-425.
  13. Hou, L., Wang, Y., Cui, Y., Pang, X., Li, Y. (2018): Optimization of a highly efficient shoot regeneration system using leaf explants of Chinese jujube (Ziziphusjujuba Mill.) by response surface methodology. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 93:289-295.
  14. Humberto, G.P., de la Vara, S. R. (2003): An?lisis y Dise?o de Experimentos. McGraw Hill. M?xico, D.F. pp 346-367.
  15. Husain, M. K., Anis, M., Shahzad, A. (2006): In vitro control of shoot tip necrosis (STN) in PterocarpusmarsupiumRoxb.-a leguminous tree. Physiol and Molecular Biol of Plants 12:259?301.
  16. Karacabey, E., Mazza, G. (2010): Optimization of antioxidant activity of grape cane extracts using response surface methodology. Food Chemistry 119:343-348.
  17. Li, C. A., Xie, L., Mao, H., Qiu, C., Srinivasan, R., Hong, Y. (2016): Engineering low phorbol ester Jatrophacurcas seed by intercepting casbene biosynthesis. Plant Cell Reports 35:103-114.
  18. Liu, Y., Lu, J., Zhu, H., Li, L., Shi, Y., Yin, X. (2016): Efficient culture protocol for plant regeneration from cotyledonary petiole explants of Jatrophacurcas L. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment 30: 907-914.
  19. Liu, Y., Tong, X., Hui, W., Liu, T., Chen, X., Li, J., Liu, Z. (2015): Efficient culture protocol for plant regeneration from petiole explants of physiologically mature trees of Jatrophacurcas L. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment 29:479-488.
  20. Miura, G. A., Miller, C. O. (1969): 6-(γ, γ-Dimethylallylamino) purine as a precursor of zeatin. Plant Physiology 44:372-376.
  21. Miller, C. O., Skoog, F., Okumura, F. S., Von Saltza, M. H., Strong, F. M. (1956): Isolation, structure and synthesis of kinetin, a substance promoting cell division1, 2. Journal of the American Chemical Society 78:1375-1380.
  22. Mok, M. C. (1994): Cytokinins and plant development. Cytokinins: chemistry, activity and function. Oregon, Unite State, pp 155-166.
  23. Murashige, T., Skoog, F. (1962): A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. PhysiologiaPlantarum 15:473-497.
  24. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., Vining, G. G., Borror, C. M., Kowalski, S. M. (2004): Response surface methodology: a retrospective and literature survey. Journal of quality technology 36:53-77.
  25. Navarro, P. F. S., Baz, R. S. A., Handler, R., Sacramento, R. J. (2016): Advances on the processing of Jatrophacurcas towards a whole-crop biorefinery. Renewable and sustainable. Energy Reviews 54:247-269.
  26. Panghal, S., Beniwal, V. S., Laura, J. S. (2012): An efficient plant regeneration protocol from petiole explants of physic nut (Jatrophacurcas L.). African Journal of Biotechnology 11:12652-12656.
  27. Prasad, K. N., Hassan, F. A., Yang, B., Kong, K. W., Ramanan, R. N., Azlan, A., Ismail, A. (2011): Response surface optimization for the extraction of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacities of underutilisedMangiferapajangKosterm peels. Food Chemistry 128:1121-1127.
  28. Raha, S., Roy, S. C. (2001): In vitro plant regeneration in Holarrhenaantidysenterica wall through high-frequency axillary shoots proliferation. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 37:232-236.
  29. Rajore, S., Batra, A. (2005): Efficient plant regeneration via shoot tip explant in Jatrophacurcas L. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 14:73-75.
  30. Sarma, K. S., Rogers, S. M. D. (2000): Plant regeneration from seedling explants of Juncuseffusus. Aquatic Botany 68:239-247.
  31. Shibli, R. A., Sharaf, S. A., Kasrawi, M. A., Al-Qudah, T. S. (2018): In Vitro Multiplication of the White Wormwood, Artemisia herba-alba asso. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences 11:265-271.
  32. Shrivastava, S., Banerjee, M. (2008): In vitro clonal propagation of physic nut (Jatrophacurcas L.): Influence of additives. Int. J. Integr. Biol 3:73-77.
  33. Soares, D. M., Sattler, M. C., da Silva Ferreira, M. F., Pra?a, F. M. (2016): Assessment of Genetic Stability in Three Generations of in vitro Propagated Jatrophacurcas L. Plantlets Using ISSR Markers. Tropical Plant Biology 9:229-238.
  34. Sujatha, M., Makkar, H. P. S., Becker K (2005): Shoot bud proliferation from axillary nodes and leaf sections of non-toxic Jatrophacurcas L. Plant Growth Regulation 47:83-90.
  35. Sundaram, U., Anupama, V., Gurumoorthi, P. (2013): Optimization of pH and sucrose in the callus culture for the micropropagation of Mucunapruriens using response surface methodology. Int J Pharm PharmaceutSci 5:420-426.
  36. Tahtamouni, R. W., Shibli, R. A., Younes, L. S. (2017): In Vitro Propagation, Direct Regeneration and Acclimatization of Solanumvillosum (L.) Mill.: A Promising Medicinal Plant That Grows Wild In Jordan. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 13:65-78.
  37. Teale, W. D., Paponov, I. A., Palme, K. (2006): Auxin in action: signalling, transport and the control of plant growth and development. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 7:847-859.
  38. Verma, K. C., Verma, S. K. (2015): Interaction effect of explants types and phytohormones on tissue culture of Jatrophacurcas seed embryo. Interaction 10:563-566.
  39. Wang, H., Liu, Y., Wei, S., Yan, Z. (2012): Application of response surface methodology to optimize supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of essential oil from Cyperusrotundus Linn. Food Chemistry 132:582-587.
  40. Werner, T., Motyka, V., Laucou, V., Smets, R., Van Onckelen, H., Schm?lling, T. (2003): Cytokinin-deficient transgenic Arabidopsis plants show multiple developmental alterations indicating opposite functions of cytokinins in the regulation of shoot and root meristem activity. The Plant Cell 15:2532-2550.
  41. Zhang, C., Fu, S., Tang, G., Hu, X., Guo, J. (2013): Factors influencing direct shoot regeneration from mature leaves of Jatrophacurcas, an important biofuel plant. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 49:529-540.
  42. Zhao, X., Han, Y., Tan, X. Q., Wang, J., Zhou, Z. J. (2014): Optimization of antifungal lipopeptide production from Bacillus sp. BH072 by response surface methodology. Journal of Microbiology 52:324-332.
  43. Zhu, X., Mang, Y., Shen, F., Xie, J., Su, W. (2014): Homogenate extraction of gardenia yellow pigment from Gardenia jasminoides Ellis fruit using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Science and Technology 51:1575-1581.

[Herrera Cool Gilbert Jose, Rodriguez Buenfil Ingrid Mayanin, Iglesias Andreu Lourdes Georgina and Lopez Puc Guadalupe (2019); OPTIMIZATION OF IN VITRO ADVENTITIOUS SHOOT INDUCTION IN JATROPHA CURCAS BY RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Mar). 1276-1284] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Lopez-Puc Guadalupe
Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco, A.C., Sede Sureste, Carretera Sierra Papacal-Chuburna Puerto Km

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8761      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8761

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 47 | No. of Views: 115