02Jan 2019

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TENSILE BOND STRENGTH AND GAP WIDTH BETWEEN SILICONE BASED SOFT LINER AND HEAT-POLYMERIZED, LIGHT POLYMERIZED AND INJECTION-MOLDED PERMANENT DENTURE BASE MATERIALS.

  • MDS, PG student, Department of Prosthodontics, Coorg institute of dental sciences, virajpet.
  • Ph.d, Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Coorg institute of dental sciences, virajpet.
  • MDS, HOD & Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Coorg institute of dental sciences, virajpet.
  • MDS, Chairperson, Department of Prosthodontics, Coorg institute of dental sciences, virajpet.
  • MDS, Department of Prosthodontics, Annoor dental college and hospital Muvathupuza, Kerala.
  • MDS, Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Coorg institute of dental sciences, virajpet.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Denture liners are polymers used on the intaglio surface of the denture. Adhesive failure can create environment for bacterial growth, staining, and failure of lining materials.Hence, the integrity of the junction needs to be evaluated because two materials polish differently.Therefore, this study compares the tensile bond strength and gap width between soft liner to heat-polymerized, injection-molded and light polymerized acrylic resins. Materials and Methods:-Ten dumbell shaped specimens for tensile bond test and square shaped specimens for gap width were fabricated with the metal mold. Putty index of dumbell shaped mold with the rectangular die in centre and two metal blanks were made. The specimes were placed in the index, adhesive was applied onto the bonding surface and soft liner was added. Tensile bond strength was determined in universal testing machine and gap width was observed under scanning electron microscope.Specimens were divided into 3 groups for tensile bond test and for gap width: T1, G1 heat-polymerizing; T2, G2 injection-molded; T3, G3 light activated denture base resins.Statistical analysis of the obtained data was done by ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey?s test. Results:-Therewas significant difference in the tensile bond strength among the three groups (p<0.05), and the mean gap width was not significant between G1 and G3 group and highly significant value was seen among G1 and G2; G2 and G3 groups (p<0.05). Conclusion:-Mollosil B bonds best with heat-polymerized denture base material and least gap with between denture base and soft liner.

  1. Tugut F, Cosun ME, Dogan DO, Kirmali O, AkinHakan. Tensile bond strength between soft liners and two chemically different denture base materials: effect of thermocycling. J Prosthodont 2016 Jun;25(4):319-23.
  2. Akin H, Tugut F, Guney U, Kirmali O, Akar T. Tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner to two chemically different denture base resins after various surface treatments. Lases med sci2013?Jan;28(1):119-23.
  3. Hamanaka I, Shimizu H, Takahashi Y. Bond strength of a chairside auto polymerizing reline resin to injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins. Journal of prosthodontics research 2017;61(1):67-72.
  4. Hamanaka I, Shimizu H, Takahashi Y. Shear bond strength of an autopolymerizing repair resin to injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins. ActaOdontolScand2013 Sep;71(5):1250-4.
  5. Machado C, Sanchez E, Azer SS, Uribe JM. Comparative study of the transverse strength of three denture base materials. J Dent 2007 Dec;35(12):930-3.
  6. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Shaull KL, Laffoon JE, Qian F. Flexural and fatigue strengths of denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 2008 Jul;100(1):47-51.
  7. Ahmad F, Dent M, Yunus N. Shear bond strength of two chemically different denture base polymers to reline materials. J Prosthet Dent 2009 oct;18(7):596-602.
  8. Razavi R, Khan Z, Fraunhofer JAV. The bond strength of a visible light-cured reline resin to acrylic resin denture base material. J Prosthet Dent 1990 Apr;63(4):485-7.
  9. Lau M, Amarnath G S, Muddugangadhar B C, Swetha M U, Das K A A K. Tensile and shear bond strength of hard and soft denture relining materials to the conventional heat cured acrylic denture base resin; an in-vitro study. J of international oral health 2014 Dec;6(2):55-61.
  10. Aydin A K, Terzioglu H, Akinay A E, Ulubayram K, Hasirci N. bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dental materials 1999?May;15(3):211-8.
  11. Mese A, Guzel KG. Effect of storage duration on the hardness and tensile bond strength of silicone and acrylic resin-based resilient denture liners to a processed denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2008 Feb;99(2):153-9.
  12. Mutluay M M, Ruyter I E. Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dental materials 2007 Nov;23(11):1373-81.
  13. Kim BJ, Yang HS, Chun MG, Park YJ. Shore hardness and tensile bond strength of long-term soft denture lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 2014 Nov;112(5):1289-97.
  14. Kulak-Ozkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H. Effect of thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003 Mar;89(3):303-10.
  15. Mutluay M M, Ruyter E I. Evaluation of adhesion of chair side hard relining materials to denture base polymers. J ProsthetDent 2005 Nov;94(5):445-52.
  16. Mittal M, Kumar S A, Sandhu H S, Iyer S R, Ahuja R S. Comparative evaluation of the tensile bond strength of two silicone based denture liners with denture base resins. Medical journal armed forces India 2016 Jul;72(3):258-64.
  17. Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A, Craig RG. Comparision of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992 Aug;68(2):368-71.
  18. Pinto JR, Mesquita MF, de ArrudaNobilo MA, Henriques GE. Evaluation of varying amounts of thermal cycling on bond strength and permanent deformation of two resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003 Mar;89(3):303-10.
  19. Mohammed SA, Hassen KS. Evaluation of some properties of four silicon based soft denture reliner materials. J BaghColl Dentistry 2011;23(2):36-42.
  20. Khan Z, Martin J, Collard S. Adhesion characteristics of visible light-cured denture base material bonded to resilient lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989 Aug;62(2):196-200.
  21. Pesun I J, Hodges J, Lai J H. effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the gap width between a denture base resin and two long-term, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2002 Mar;87(3):311-8.
  22. Radford DR, Watson TF, Walter JD, Challacombe SJ. The effects of surface machining on heat cured acrylic resin and two soft denture base materials: a scanning electron microscope and confocal microscope evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1997 Aug;78(2):200-8.
  23. Al-Athel M, Khier S. SEM assessment of the nature of the interface between molloplast-B and denture base materials. Saud Dent J 1997 sept;9(3):113-8.
  24. Hamanaka I, Takahashi Y, Shimizu H. Mechanical properties of injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins. ActaOdontolScand2011 Mar;69(2):75-9.

[Pallavi N. T, Regish K. M, Basavaraj S. Salagundi, Rupesh P. L , Jyothi K. S., Unni Pympallil and Bhavana B.L. (2019); COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TENSILE BOND STRENGTH AND GAP WIDTH BETWEEN SILICONE BASED SOFT LINER AND HEAT-POLYMERIZED, LIGHT POLYMERIZED AND INJECTION-MOLDED PERMANENT DENTURE BASE MATERIALS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Jan). 296-305] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Pallavi N. T
MDS, PG student, Department of Prosthodontics, Coorg institute of dental sciences, virajpet.

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8327      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8327

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 35 | No. of Views: 162