18Dec 2018

MAINTAINING GURAGINA LANGUAGE WITH REFERENCE TO STATUS AND ATTITUDE

  • College of Social Science and Humanities, Department of English Language and Literature, Wolite University
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This paper describes a research project that examines maintaining Guragina language with reference to attitude and status of the language in the community in Gurage Zone, Ethiopia. A total of 340 questionnaires distributed to the speakers of Guragigna in the Zone. Twenty four key informants were interviewed for their opinions on the use and importance of Guragina. Besides, 6 FGDs were conducted. The findings show that participants\\\' attitude towards the language is positive. They also agreed that Guragigna is multifarious in dialect, with some in the community viewing it as a language of solidarity, while others bemoan its irrelevance in the changed circumstances of modern life. The finding also suggests that the respondents are not satisfied with their current ability to speak the language; they make language shift to the use of Amharic. Furthermore, Guragina is a low status language with low social and economic prestige and poor documentation. Guragina is mainly used at home and market domains. Instead Amharic is the dominant language in the court, office and religious places with some shift from Amharic to Guragina and vice-versa.Thus all levels of government should support the profile and prestige of Guragina language by allowing it to be used in a range of public functions such as legal situation, health situations. Besides the local and regional government should introduce Guragina language as a subject to be taught in schools using comparative analysis of Guragina language varieties, and in long term the language should be used as medium of instruction by standardizing Guraginavarities. Besides,Guragina language centre should be opened at Wolkite University for studying the language and documentation.


  1. Allard, R. and Landry, R. (1986) ?Subjective ethnolinguistic vitality viewed as a belief system.? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7:1?12.
  2. AFN (1990) Towards Linguistic Justice for First Nations. Ottawa: Assembly of First Nations Education Secretariat: Ottawa.
  3. Barrena, A., Amorrortu, E., Ortega, A., Uranga, B., Izagirre, E., &Idiazabal, I. (2007). Small languages and small language communities 56: Does the number of speakers of a language determine its fate? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 186, 125-139.
  4. Barsh, R.L. (1994) ?Canada?s Aboriginal Peoples: Social Integration or Disintegration?? The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 14: 1?46.
  5. Bell, L., Burton, D., Funk, A. and White, J (1995) ?Aboriginal Education Program: Case Study.? B.C. School District No. 50 (Queen Charlotte).
  6. Bernard, H. R. (1996). Language Preservation and Publishing. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Indigenous Literacies in the Americas: Language planning from the bottom up (pp. 136-156). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  7. Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H. and Rosenthal, D. (1981) ?Notes on the construction of a `Subjective Vitality Questionnaire? for ethnolinguistic groups.? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2: 144?55.
  8. Broadhead, J. (1995) GwaiiHaanas Transitions Study. Queen Charlotte Islands: Queen Charlotte Islands Museum Press.
  9. Blair, H., Rice, S., Wood, V., &Janvier, J. (2002). Daghida: Cold lake first nation works towards dene language revitalization. In B. Burnaby, & J. A. Reyhner (Eds.), Indigenous languages across the community (pp. 89-98). Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University: Center for Excellence in Education.
  10. Crystal, D. (2000). Language Death. Cambridge: University Press.
  11. Clement, R. (1986) ?Second Language Proficiency and Acculturation: An investigation of the effects of language status and individual characteristics.? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5: 271?290.
  12. Comrey, A.L. (1973) A first Course in Factor Analysis. New York: Academic Press.
  13. Cummins, J. (1986) ?Empowering Minority Students.? Harvard Educational Review, 56: 18-3.
  14. Fekede, M.(2015). Intergroup Communication among the Gurage. A Study on Intelligibility, Interlingua Comprehension and Accommodation. Lap Lambert Publishing.
  15. Giles, H., Leets, L. andCoupland, N. (1990) ?Minority Language Group Sta?tus: a theoretical conspexus.? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 11: 37?56.
  16. Lambert, W. (1977) ?Effects of bilingualism on the individual.? In Bilingual?ism: Psychological, Social and Educational Implications, edited by P. A. Hornby. New York: Academic Press.

[Chernet Zerga Wejira and Tiglu Geza Nisrane (2018); MAINTAINING GURAGINA LANGUAGE WITH REFERENCE TO STATUS AND ATTITUDE Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Dec). 879-893] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Chernet Zerga Wejira
Wolkite University

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8212      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8212