03Dec 2018

STUDY ON BIOMETRIC INDEXES, PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF SOYBEAN WITH USAGE OF FERTILIZER PRODUCTS OF AGROPOLYCHIM AD.

  • Department of Plant Production, Technical University ? Varna, Varna, Bulgaria.
  • Department of Soil Science, University of Forestry ? Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  • Department ?Agrochemistry and Soil Science?, ?Afer Bulgaria? EOOD.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

In the present experiment has been studied the impact of six fertilizer products of ?Agropolychim? AD over basic biometric indexes, the productivity and quality of soybean. For the purpose on a training-experimental field of ?Plant production? department has been set an experiment with variety PR91M10. The results show that with largest height distinguishes the control, but the difference in comparison with the following it as per value three fertilizer variants is untrustworthy. There lacks proofness of the differences between the separate fertilizer products as per the indication number of beans on a plant (the value is highest with usage of ammonium nitrate), except for the fertilizing with UAN. The analysis of the data for number of seeds as per a plant indicates that the variant with DAP produces most, but the following it as per value three variants do not differ reliably from it. The seeds are best fed as a result of fertilizing with NPK and UAN. The data for productivity display statistically proved superiority with usage of MAP and DAP in comparison with the other products included in the experiment. The biochemical data display that with fertilizing with MAP is obtained a soybean with the highest content of protein and with lowest oiliness, and it is highest at the variant with UAN.

  1. Afza, R., Hardarson, G., Zapata, F. and Danso, S.K.A. 1987. Effects of delayed soil and foliar N fertilization on yield and N2 fixation of soybean. Plant Soil, 97: 361-368.
  2. Borges, R. and Mallarino, A.P. 2000. Grain yield, early growth, and nutrient uptake of no-till soybean as affected by phosphorus and potassium placement. Agron. J., 92: 380-388.
  3. Casanova, E., 2000. Phosphorus and potassium fertilization and mineral nutrition of soybean. Interciencia, 25(2): 92-95.
  4. Gutierrez-Boem, F.H., Prystupa, P., Ferraris, G. 2007. Seed number and yield determination in sulfur deficient soybean crops. J. Plant Nutr., 30: 93-104.
  5. Hassan, A., Mohamad, A., Abdu, A., Idrus, R.M. and Besar, N.A. 2010. Soil properties under Orthosiphon stamineus (Benth) intercropped with Durio zibethinus (Murr) and treated with various organic fertilizers. Paper presented on 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World 1-6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia.
  6. Messiga, A.J., Ziadi, N., Morel, C., Grant, C., Tremblay, G., Lamarre, G. and Parent, L-E. 2012. Long term impact of tillage practices and biennial P and N fertilization on maize and soybean yields and soil P status. Field Crops Research 133: 10-22.
  7. Mugendi, E., Gitonga, N., Oheruiyot, R. and Maingi, J. 2010. Biological nitrogen fixation by promiscuous soybean (Glycine max Merril) in the central highlands of Kenya: response to inorganic fertilizer soil amendments. World J. Agric. Sci., 6(4): 381-387.
  8. Nieuwenhuis, R. and Nieuwelink, J. 2002. Cultivation of soybean and other legumes. Agrodok-Series No. 10. Agromisa Foundation, Wageningen, The Netherland.
  9. Plamenov, D., Naskova, P. and Yankova, P. 2017. Study of the macronutrient elements content in the soil at a fertilizer experiment with soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). International Journal of Horticulture, Agriculture and Food Science, 1(4): 17-23.
  10. Salvagiotti, F., Gerster, G., Bacigaluppo, S., Castellar?n, J.M., Galarza, C., Gonz?lez, N., Gudelj, O., Novello, O.A., Pedrol, H.M. and Vallone, P. 2004. Efectos residualez y directos de f?sforo y azufre en el rendimiento de soja de segunda. Cienc. Suelo, 22: 92-101.
  11. Salvagiotti, F., Ferraris, G., Quiroga, A., Barraco, M., Vivas, H., Prystupa, P., Echeveria, H.E. and Gutierrez-Boem, F.H. 2012. Identifying sulfur deficient fields by using sulfur content: N:S ratio and nutrient stoichiometric relationships in soybean seeds. Field Crops Res., 135: 107-115.
  12. Salvagiotti, F., Barraco, M., Dignani, D., Sanchez, H., Bono, A., Vallone, P., Gerster, G., Galarza, C., Montoya, J. and Gudelj, V.J. 2013. Plant stand, nodulation and seed yield in soybean as affected by phosphate fertilizer placement, source and application method. Europ. J. Agronomy 51: 25-33.
  13. Sanginga, N. 2003. Role of biological nitrogen fixation in legume based cropping systems: a case study of West Africa farming systems. Plant and Soil, 252: 25-39.
  14. Sorensen, R.C. and Penas, E.J. 1978. Nitrogen fertilization of soybeans. Agron. J., 79: 986-991.
  15. Starling, M.E., Wesley, C., Wood, C.W. and Weaver, D.B. 1998. Starter nitrogen and growth habit effects on late-planted soybean. Agronomy Journal, 90(5): 658-662.
  16. Weber, C.R.1966. Nodulating and nonnodulating soybean isolines: II. Response to applied nitrogen and modified soil conditions. Agron. J., 58: 46-49.
  17. Wesley, T.L., Lamond, R.E., Martin, V.L. and Duncan, S.R. 1998. Effects of late-season nitrogen fertilizer on irrigated soybean yield and composition. J. Prod. Agric., 11: 331-336.
  18. Wittry, D.J., Mallarino, A.P. 2004. Comparison of uniform- and variable-rate phosphorus fertilization for corn-soybean rotations. Agron. J., 96: 26-33.
  19. Wood, C.W., Torbet, H.A. and Weaver, D.B. 1993. Nitrogen fertilizer effects on soybean growth, yield, and seed composition. J. Prod. Agric., 6: 354-360.

[Dragomir Plamenov, Pavlina Naskova, Bojka Malcheva and Yordan Iliev. (2018); STUDY ON BIOMETRIC INDEXES, PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF SOYBEAN WITH USAGE OF FERTILIZER PRODUCTS OF AGROPOLYCHIM AD. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Dec). 131-136] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Dragomir Plamenov
Technical University - Varna

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8123      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8123

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 11 | No. of Views: 89