18Nov 2018

CONTENT VALIDITY OF TECHNOLOGY INFORMATICS GUIDING EDUCATION REFORM (TIGER) ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR INFORMATICS COMPETENCIES OF GRADUATING NURSING STUDENT.

  • College of Health Sciences, Mindanao State University, Marawi City, Philippines. San Pedro College, Davao City, Philippines.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Informatics competencies assessment instrument developed by Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) is an essential tool for appraising the graduating student nurses? competencies in nursing informatics. The TIGER recommended informatics competencies developed through collaborative effort of expert health care professionals abroad, validation of its content was not appraised in the Philippine setting. A need for further validation supports universal practical application of the tool despite variations in the age of technology country-by-country. Hence, this paper aims to examine the content validity of TIGER assessment instrument for informatics competencies in the context of graduating student nurses. Methods employed are literature review and 4-point scale content validity questionnaire rating each item for relevance, ambiguity, clarity, and simplicity. The assessment tool as divided into three domain ? computer competencies with eleven main items and 211 sub-items, information literacy competencies with five main items and 39 sub-items, and information management competencies with five main items and 70sub-items has been evaluated through Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Index (CVI) and Modified Kappa Coefficient (K*). The result for CVR scores revealed that 308 out of320 items are considered critical by the content experts. Then, CVI and K* revealed that still 308items under the three domains of informatics competencies are appropriate and excellent while the remaining 12 were reasonably deleted. Thus, the instrument is a valid and excellent instrument to address informatics competencies of graduating student nurses in the country.


  1. Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (2014). The TIGER initiative: informatics competencies for every practicing nurse: recommendations from the TIGER collaborative [Internet]. Available from:http://www.thetigerinitiative.org/docs/TigerReport_InformaticsCompetencies_001.pdf
  2. Commission on Higher Education [CHED] (2017). CHED Memorandum Order no.15 series of 2017. Subject: Policies, Standards, and Guidelines for the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) Program. ched.gov.ph
  3. Professional Regulatory Commission [PRC] (2012). Core Competency Standards of Nursing Practice in the Philippines. prc.gov.ph
  4. Jensen R, Guedes ES, Leite MMJ (2016). Informatics competencies essential to decision making in nursing management. Rev Esc Enferm USP.;50(1):109-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420160000100015
  5. Yaghmaie, F. (2003). Content Validity and its Estimation. Journal of Medical Education. Spring 2003; 3 (1): 25-27.
  6. Polit, Denise F. and Cheryl Tatano Beck (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489-497. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20147
  7. Hadzaman, NAH; Takim, R.; Nawawi AH and N Mohamad Yusuwan (2017). Content Validity of Governing in Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation Assessment Instrument. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 140 (2018) 012105. doi :10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012105
  8. Chien, W.T., & Norman, I. (2004). The validity andreliability of a Chinese version of the Family BurdenInterview Schedule. Nursing Research, 53, 314?322.
  9. Sauls, D.J. (2004). The Labor Support Questionnaire: Development and psychometric analysis. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 12, 123?312.
  10. Smith, A.J., Thurkettle, M.A.,&dela Cruz, F.A. (2004). Use of intuition by nursing students: Instrument development and testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47, 614?622.
  11. Lawshe C 1975 A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity 1 Psychol. 1 563?575
  12. Ayre C and ScallyA J 2014 Critical values for Lawshe?s content validity ratio: Revisiting theoriginal methods of calculation Eval. Couns. Dev. (Sage Publ. Inc. )47(1) 79?86
  13. Zamanzadeh V, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Majd H A, Nikanfar A and Ghahramanian A (2014). Details of content validity and objectifying it in instrument development Pract. Today1(3) 163?171
  14. Davis L L 1992 Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts,? Nurs. Res. 5(4)194?197
  15. Cicchetti D V and Sparrow S A 1981 Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of
specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior Am. J. Ment. Defic. 86(2)127?137

[Hamdoni K. Pangandaman (2018); CONTENT VALIDITY OF TECHNOLOGY INFORMATICS GUIDING EDUCATION REFORM (TIGER) ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR INFORMATICS COMPETENCIES OF GRADUATING NURSING STUDENT. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Nov). 682-688] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Hamdoni K. Pangandaman
Mindanao State University, 9700, Philippines

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8047      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8047