17Sep 2018

EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF TEACHING COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN: FAMILIARIZATION OF NOVICE STUDENTS WITH TECHNIQUES OF DIGITAL ARCHITECTURAL/URBAN/PLANNING DESIGN AND INTERACTIVE SIMULATION OF A BUILT-UP AREA.

  • Laboratory of rural area, Department of Planning & Regional Development, University of Thessaly, Greece.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Object: This research refers to the teaching of computer aided architectural/urban design and presents an educational process/method of digital design/simulation of architectural and urban space via computer aided design systems. This educational process was applied in tertiary education in two faculties of engineering of European universities and was taught to engineering students who studied architectural/urban/regional spatial planning. Methods: The phases of this educational process broadly (a) identify needs in the framework of teaching digital design and (b) define pedagogical thematic entities and their contents in the form of lesson plans (defining a study area, students? roles and groups, and describing partial, short-term and long-term research objectives). This educational process was evaluated by (a) a questionnaire on digital design influence on students? learning, understanding and practice and (b) a students? grade results analysis of digital design courses. Results: 68% of the students indicated the ?learning and adapting digital design process? as a normal to easy process and almost 80% that digital design helps 2D/3D spatial perception. Only 39% of the students indicate that digital design helps significantly the design conception process (lack of digital design integration in conception process). Furthermore, the learning performance of the university students (higher academic level) proved more significant than that of those who attended technological educational institutes (lower academic level). Conclusions: The digital design process necessitates a clearly engineering reflection. On the other hand, the engineer must ?protect? and ?adjust? their critical approach and conception process to the demands of digital design methodologies.

  1. Achten, H., (1996): Teaching advanced Architectural issues through principles of CAAD. Education for Practice [14th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9523687-2-2] Lund (Sweden) 12-14 September 1996, pp. 7-16.
  2. Alvarado, R.G. and Maver, T. (1999): Virtual reality in architectural education: defining possibilities. ACADIA Quarterly, 18(4): 7-9.
  3. Ataman, O. (1995): Bulding a computer aid for teaching architectural design concepts. Computing in Design - Enabling, Capturing and Sharing Ideas [ACADIA Conference Proceedings / ISBN 1-880250-04-7] University of Washington (Seattle, Washington / USA) October 19-22, 1995, pp. 187-208.
  4. Bailey, R. (2005): Digital Tools for Design Learning. The case of a Caribbean Design Primer for Beginning Architectural Students. Digital Design: The Quest for New Paradigms [23nd eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9541183-2-4] Lisbon (Portugal) 21-24 September 2005, pp. 131-138.
  5. Boning, B., Ichniowski, C. And Shaw, K. (2007): Opportunity Counts: Teams and the Effectiveness of Production Incentives. Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, 25: 613-650.
  6. Gomez Puente, S., Van Eijck, M. and Jochems, W. (2012): A sampled literature review of design-based learning approaches: a search for key characteristics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(2).
  7. Hartley, R. (1999): Theory and Practice of Projective Rectification. International Journal of Computer Vision, 35(2):115-127.
  8. Iordanova, I. (2007): Teaching Digital Design Exploration: Form Follows. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 5(4):685-702.
  9. Jensen, M., Moore, R. and Hatch, J. (2002): Cooperative Learning ? Part I: Cooperative Quizzes. The American Biology Teacher, January 1, 2002, 64(1): 29-34.
  10. Kotnik, T. (2010): Digital Architectural Design as Exploration of Computable Functions. International journal of architectural computing, 8( 1).
  11. Κouzeleas, S. and Semidor, C. (2002): Αrchitectural translation of the acoustical simulation results. International congress of the Institute of Acoustics, subject : Auditorium Acoustics : Historical and contemporary design and performance, Imperial College, Proceedings : 25(4), 2002 ? ISBN?: 1 901656 47 0,? 19-21 July 2002, London, England.
  12. Kouzeleas, S. (2011): Computational design contributions of integrative architectural and urban digital design methodology based on satellite images. International Journal in Research in Architecture and Construction PARC, Department of Architecture and Building of the School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Design of the State University of Campinas, Brazil (UNICAMP), 2(7):86-101.
  13. Kouzeleas, S. and Mammou, O. (2012): Architectural, urban digital design and spatial simulation tools in digital cities cartography: Contribution in spatial design and perception. International American Jounal of Contemporary Research (IAJCR), 2(8):237-256 .
  14. Kruck, S. E., and Teer, F. P. (2009): Interdisciplinary student teams projects: A case study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(3): 325?330.
  15. Lane, D., Seery, N., and Gordon, S. (2009): The understated value of freehand sketching in technology education. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 73(3):13?22.
  16. Leutner, D. (2000): Double-fading support-A training approach to complex software systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16:347?357.
  17. Lochhead, J. (1979): An introduction to cognitive process instruction. Cognitive process instruction (Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press, 1979).
  18. Lombardi, M. M. (2007): Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), EDUCAUSE learning initiative: Advancing learning through IT innovation, pp. 1?12.
  19. McLaren, S. V. (2008): Exploring perceptions and attitudes towards teaching and learning manual technical drawing in a digital age. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18:167?188.
  20. Mohler, J. L. (2007): An instructional strategy for pictorial drawing. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44(3):5?26.
  21. Mohler, J. L. and Miller, C. L. (2008): Improving spatial ability with mentored sketching. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 72(1):19?27.
  22. National Research Council (NRC). (2006):. Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  23. Olkun, S. (2003): Making connections: Improving spatial abilities with engineering drawing abilities. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Center for Innovation in Mathematics Teaching, University of Plymouth, UK.
  24. Onishi, Y., Morozumi, M. and Homma, R. (2006): Image data archive system for reference materials in architecture design education. CAADRIA 2006 [Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia] Kumamoto (Japan) March 30th - April 2nd 2006, pp. 537-539
  25. Onyancha, R., Derov, M. and Kinsey, B. (2009): Improvements in Spatial Ability as a Result of Targeted Training and Computer-Aided Design Software Use: Analyses of Object Geometries and Rotation Types. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2).
  26. Oxman, R., Hammer, R. and Ben Ari, S. (2007): Performative design in architecture. Proceeding of ECAADE International Conference 2007, Wiesbaden and Frankfurt, Germany
  27. Oxman, R. (2008): Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: theory, knowledge, models and medium. Design Studies, 2008, 29(2):99-120.
  28. Park, J., Kim, D-E. and Sohn, M. H. (2010): 3D simulation technology as an effective instructional tool for enhancing spatial visualization skills in apparel design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.
  29. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. (1994): Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3:265-283.
  30. Scianna, A. (1996): What software for instruction in architecture: today features and needs for the future, Education for Practice [14th eCAADe Conference Proceedings / ISBN 0-9523687-2-2] Lund (Sweden) 12-14 September 1996, pp. 391-402.
  31. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen P., Raunio, A., Raami, A., Muukkonen, H. and Hakkarainen, K. (2001): Computer Support for Collaborative Designing, International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 11(2):181?202.
  32. Silva, N.F. (2000): Computer-Aided Architectural Design Teaching: a Design Oriented Post-Grad Experience. SIGraDi?2000 - Construindo (n)o espacio digital (constructing the digital Space) [4th SIGRADI Conference Proceedings / ISBN 85-88027-02-X] Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) 25-28 september 2000, pp. 370-373.
  33. Sorby, S. A. (2005): Assessment of a ??new and improved?? course for the development of 3-D spatial skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 69(3):6?13.
  34. Sorby, S. A. (2009): Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students, International Journal of Science Education, 31(3):459?480.
  35. Stavric, M., Schimek, H. and Wiltsche, A. (2007): Didactical integration of analog and digital tools into architectural education. From the geometric sketch to the rapid prototyping manufactured artefact. Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures / 978-1-4020-6527-9 2007 [Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures / 978-1-4020-6527-9] Sydney (Australia) 11?13 July 2007, pp. 61-70.
  36. Talbott, T. (2003): An Inductive Approach to Digital Modeling Instruction. Connecting >> Crossroads of Digital Discourse [Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design In Architecture / ISBN 1-880250-12-8] Indianapolis (Indiana) 24-27 October 2003, pp. 151-157.
  37. Van Zutphen, R.H.M., Turksma, A., Achten, H.H., and Klercker, J. AF. (1999): AVOCAAD, teaching CAAD on the internet. CAADRIA '99 [Proceedings of The Fourth Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia / ISBN 7-5439-1233-3] Shanghai (China) 5-7 May 1999, pp. 345-354.
  38. Woo, S., Takenaka, Y. and Sasada, T. (1996): 4 architectural virtual space in design education. CAADRIA ?96 [Proceedings of The First Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia / ISBN 9627-75-703-9] Hong Kong (Hong Kong) 25-27 April 1996, pp. 27-33.
  39. Youssef, Β. and Berry, Β. (2011): Learning to think spatially in an undergraduate interdisciplinary computational design context: a case study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(4):541-564.
  40. Yue, J. (2006): Spatial Visualization by Isometric Drawing. Proceedings of IJME - INTERTECH International Conference on Engineering & Technology, Kean University, USA.
  41. Zaero-Polo, A. (2001): Roller coaster construction, in Verb 1: processing, pp 13-15

[Stelios Kouzeleas. (2018); EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF TEACHING COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN: FAMILIARIZATION OF NOVICE STUDENTS WITH TECHNIQUES OF DIGITAL ARCHITECTURAL/URBAN/PLANNING DESIGN AND INTERACTIVE SIMULATION OF A BUILT-UP AREA. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Sep). 424-441] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

STELIOS KOUZELEAS
Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly, Greece

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7692      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7692

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 19 | No. of Views: 83