28Aug 2018

Viscoelastic Properties of Hard and Soft Denture Base Reline Materials

  • Researcher, Fixed & Removable Prosthodontic Dep., National Research Centre (NRC), Giza, Egypt.
  • Asst Prof, Restorative & Dental Materials Dep, National Research Centre (NRC), Giza, Egypt.
  • Asst Prof, Fixed & Removable Prosthodontic Dep., National Research Centre (NRC), Giza, Egypt.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Background: Reline materials are integral part in management of patients wearing removal complete dentures. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess and compare the viscoelastic properties of the permanent hard acrylic resin reline and silicone based soft liner materials. Materials and methods: Rectangular specimens of the hard reline (Acrostone, Dental & Medical Co, Egypt) and silicone liner (Molloplast B, Detax Karl Huber GmbH & Co., Karlsruhe, Germany) materials were fabricated according to the manufacturer’s instructions of each material. The viscoelastic properties regarding (G \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\', G \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' and tan ?) were measured using visco-elastometer under shear mode of deformation at a frequency of 1 Hz at 37°C. Results: The hard resin reline material showed higher statistically significant mean values (P<0.05) regarding the three measured parameters. However, both materials had tan ? values approaching zero. Conclusions: within the limitation of this study the following could be concluded: Both materials had cushioning effect and the ability to dissipate energy into heat. However, hard resin reline absorb more energy consequently, it reduces stress transmitted to alveolar mucosa more than that of silicone based soft liner. Key words, Viscoelastic, denture reline, hard and soft reline material.

  1. Ahmad F. and Yunus N. (2009): Shear Bond Strength of Two Chemically Different Denture Base Polymers to Reline Materials. Journal of prosthodontics., 18;7 :596-602.
  2. Balaji A, Mohamed J B and Kathiresan R. (2010): A Pilot Study of Mini Implants as a Treatment Option for Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Ridges with Sub-Optimal Bone Volume. J. Maxillofacial. Oral Surg., 9; 4:334?38.
  3. Botega DM, Sanchez JL, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE and Consani RL. (2008): Effects of thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of three permanent soft denture liners. J Prosthodont.,17:550554.
  4. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade Q, Duncan J, Gizani S, (2002): The Mc Gill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two- implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants.,17: 601-602.
  5. Hamada T. and Murata H. (2001): Denture lining. Tokyo; Dental Diamond Co.: 68-76 (in Japanese).
  6. Jin, C., Nikawa H., Makihira S, Hamada T., Furukawa M and Murata H. (2003): Changes in surface roughness and color stability of soft denture lining materials caused by denture cleansers. J Oral Rehab., 30: 125-130.
  7. Leles C. R., Machado A. L., Vergani C. E., Giampaolo E. T. & Pavarina A. C. (2001): Bonding strength between a hard chairside reline resin and a denture base material as influenced by surface treatment Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. ,28; 1153-1157.
  8. Machado AL, Breeding LC and Puckett AD (2005): Effect of microwave disinfection on the hardness and adhesion of two resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent., 94:183?189.
  9. Mese A. and Guzel KG. (2008): Effect of storage duration on the hardness and tensile bond strength of silicone and acrylic resinbased resilient denture liners to a processed denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent.; 99:1539.
  10. Murata H, Taguchi N, Hamada T and McCabe JF. (2000): Dynamic viscoelastic properties and the age changes of long-term soft denture liners. Biomaterials.; 21: 1421-1427.
  11. Murata, H.; Taguchi, N.; Hamada, T.; Kawamura, M. and McCabe, J.F. (2002): Dynamic viscoelasticity of soft liners and masticatory function. J. Dent. Res.;81, 123?128.
  12. Murata H,?Seo RS,?Hamada T,?Polyzois GL and?Frangou MJ. (2007): Dynamic mechanical properties of hard, direct denture reline resins. J Prosthet;98:319-26.
  13. Murata H, Hamada T and Sadamori S. (2008): Relationship between viscoelastic properties of soft denture liners and clinical efficacy Japanese Dental Science Review.;44; 128?132.
  14. Santawisuk W,?Kanchanavasita W,?Sirisinha C. and Harnirattisai C.(2010):Dynamic viscoelastic properties of experimental silicone soft lining materials. Dent Mater J.;29; 4:454-60.
  15. Takase K, Watanabe I, Kurogi T. and Murata H. (2015): Evaluation of glass transition temperature and dynamic mechanical properties of auto-polymerized hard direct denture reline resins. Dental Materials Journal.; 34;2: 211?218.
  16. Tolidis K, Papadogiannis D and Gerasimou P. (2012): Dynamic and static mechanical analysis of resin luting cements. J the Mech Behav Biomed Mater.; 6:1-8. 4:454-60.
  17. Van Meegen HG. and Kalk W. (2011): Improvement of a removable complete denture by relining or rebasing. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd.;118; 11:545-51.
  18. Villar A. (2003): Clinical evaluation of a new resilient denture liner: (Pt 1) compliance and color evaluation. J Prosthodont., 12: 82-89.

[Sherihan M. Eissa, Dalia Y. Zaki, Asmaa N. Elboraey, Amani R. Moussa (2018); Viscoelastic Properties of Hard and Soft Denture Base Reline Materials Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Aug). 1234-1237] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Sherihan Mohamed Eissa
National research center

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7635      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7635

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 79 | No. of Views: 214