26Jul 2018

PREDICTING PRESSURE FILTER NET SOLIDS YIELD USING BUCKINGHAM-π METHOD OF LMT DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS.

  • Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

A model for predicting Pressure filter Net Solids Yield has been derived using Buckingham-π method of LMT Dimensional Analysis. It was observed in previous studies that addition of large amounts of chemical conditioners could alter the initial solids content of the original slurry to be filtered. Increment in the initial solids content also occurs when skeleton builders are mixed with chemical conditioners. The filter cake yield of such slurry would definitely be higher while the resulting specific resistance would be lower. To account for these additions, it is important that a valid filter cake yield model with a correction factor, F be derived. In furtherance of the above, a new equation expressing the filter cake yield as net sludge solids was derived with further incorporation of the cake compressibility coefficient. It was established that filter net solids yield is directly proportional with the operating pressures, initial sludge solids content, and conditioner dosages while being inversely proportional to specific resistance to filtration, pressing time, sludge viscosity and sludge compressibility . The difference between the actual cake yields and the net solids yield accounts for the quantity of the ferric chloride coagulant used in this study. The new equation enables performance of a pressure filter (Filter Press) to be predicted from a simple laboratory determination of cake yields. Moreover, curves derived from the model show how increasing ferric chloride dosage from 11.87% to 22.61% increased net solids yield from 2.4254g/Cm2.S to 2.7052g/Cm2.S while reducing specific resistance from 1.7372 x 1010Cm/g to 1.5940 x 1010Cm/g. The optimum dosage from the graph to attain acceptable filtrate quality was 19.61% at an operating pressure of 5098.58g/Cm2. Also, considering the differences in the parameters tested, it is significant that they all responded similarly when compared with previous research works.


  1. Ademiluyi, J.O., 1984. Filtration Equation for Compressible Sludge at Constant Vacuum Pressure. D. Thesis in Civil Engineering at University of Nigeria: Nsukka, Nigeria.
  2. Ademiluyi, J.O, 1981. The filterability and Compressibility of industrial and domestic sludge. Sc thesis submitted to Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nigeria.
  3. Ademiluyi, J.O, Onwe, J.I., 2018. Use of the Concept of Ive,s Filterability Number to Determine the Effects of Vacuum Filtration Process. Nigerian Journal of Technology. Vol.37. No.2,? 548-555.? Available at http://www.nijotech.com/http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njt.v37i2.35
  4. Ademiluyi, J.O., Arimieari, L.W., 2012. Evaluating, the Specific Resistance of conditioned Sludge filtration as Natural drying bed. International Journal of Current Research. Vol. 4(2), 157-161.
  5. Ademiluyi, J., 1987. Development in constant vacuum cake filtration Theory. Proceedings of the Engineering section of the science Association of Nigeria Journal. Vol. 6 and 7.
  6. Andreoli,C.V, Barros, I.T, Costa, A.C.S.,2006. Evaluation of the Sanitation of Sewage Sludge using anaerobic acid and alkaline treatments. J.Sanepar 24: 61-69.
  7. Afangiden, C.B, Ademiluyi, J.O, Aniekan, S., 2 Comparative Study of the LMT and FLMT Dimensional Equations for Sludge Filtration. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol 9. pp 224-234.
  8. Anazodo, U.G., 1974. Dimensional Equation for sludge filtration. Effluent and water Treatment Journal, P. 517.
  9. Brix, H., 2017. Sludge Dewatering and Mineralization in Sludge Treatment Reed Beds. MDPI Water, Vol. 9(160),?? available at mdpi.com/journal/water,doi:10.3390/w9030160.
  10. Carman, P., 1934. A study of Mechanism of filtration Part 11. Journal of the society of Chemical Industry, Transactions communication. Vol. 53, No 6.1591-1651.
  11. Carman, P., 1938. Fundamental Principles of Industrial Filtration. Transaction- Institution of Chemical Engineers Vol 16, pp 168-188.
  12. Coackley, P.C and Jones, B.R., 195 Vacuum sludge filtration I: Interpretation of Result by Concept of Specific Resistance. Saw. Ind.Water.
  13. Dick, R.I., 1972. Sludge Treatment in Physiochemical Process for Water Quality Control. W. J Weber, Jr., (Ed.), Wiley Inter-science, New York.
  14. Gale, R.S, Baskerville, R.C., 1970. Studies on the Vacuum Filtration of Sewage Sludges. Water Pollution Control.? 514-536.
  15. Garg, N. K., 2009. Multicriteria Assessment of Alternative Sludge Disposal Methods. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Strathclyde. Available at: http://www.esru.strath.ac.uk/Documents/MSc_2009/Garg.pdf [Accessed 21 December 2014]
  16. Ghazy, M., Dockhorn, T., Dichtt, N., 2009. Sewage Management in Egypt: Current status and Perspectives towards a Sustainable Agricultural Use. International Journal of Environmental, Ecological, Geological and Mining Engineering, 3 (9).
  17. Jones, B., 1956. Vacuum sludge filtration II: Prediction of Filter Performance. Sewage Industrial Wastes Journal, Vol. 28, pp 1103-1115.
  18. Novak, J.T, O Brien, J.H., 1975. Polymer Conditioning of Chemical Sludges.? Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 47(10), 2397-2410.
  19. Olukanni, D. O., Agunwamba. J. C., Abalogu, R. U., 2013. Interaction between Suspended and Settled Solid Particles in Cassava Wastewater. The Scientific Research and Essays, 8 (10). pp 414-424.
  20. Onosakponeme, O.R, Onyejekwe, S. C., 2014. Systematic Modelling of Sludge Filtration Process using Dimensional Analyses Technique. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol.4, Issue 6(3), pp43-53.
  21. Peter K, Donald (1975). Transport Phenomena applied to sludge dewateri Journal of the A.S.C.E, Environmental Eng. Div.? Vol. 10, pp.927-985.
  22. Pietila, K.A., Joubert, P.J., 1981. Examination of Process Parameters affecting Sludge Dewatering ?with ?a ?Diagram ?Filter ?Press. ?JWPCF ??Vol.53, No. 12,? pp1708-171
  23. Randal, C.W., King, P.H., 2001. Activated Sludge Dewatering. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 102.
  24. Raput, R.K., 2004. A textbook of Fluid Mechanics and hydroxide of machines? S. chand & Company Lt Ram Nagan New Delhi, 10055. pp 296-322.
  25. Svarovsky, L., 2000. Solid-Liquid Separation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  26. Rebhun, M, Zall, N., Galil, N., 1989.? Net Sludge Solids Yield as an Expression of Filterability for Conditioner Optimization.? Journal of Water Pollution Control Fed, Vol.61, No.1,? pp52-54.
  27. Sorenson, P.B, Hanson, J.A., 1993. Extreme Solid Compressibility in Biological Sludge Dewatering. Water Sci.Tech. 28(1), pp133-143.
  28. Uggetti, E., Ferrer, I., Llorens, E., Garcia, J., 2010.? Sludge treatment wetlands: A review on the state of the art. Bioresour. Technol. 101, pp2905?2912. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zall, J, Rebhun, M., 1987. Skeleton Builders for Conditioning Oily Sludge. Journal of Water Pollution Control Fed.? 99, pp 699-740.

[Onwe John Ituma and Ademiluyi Joel. (2018); PREDICTING PRESSURE FILTER NET SOLIDS YIELD USING BUCKINGHAM-π METHOD OF LMT DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Jul). 902-918] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Onwe John Ituma
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7440      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7440