24Jun 2018

A STUDY OF MEASUREMENT OF ACETABULAR INCLINATION ANGLE RADIOLOGICALLY IN NORTHERN INDIAN POPULATION OF JAMMU REGION.

  • JR Department of orthopaedics GMC Jammmu.
  • SR department of orthopaedics.
  • Shri Mahant Indresh Hospital Dehradun.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The acetabulum is a cup-shaped socket of the hipbone that derives its name from its resemblance to a shallow Roman vinegar cup. In clinical medicine, measurements of the acetabulum are crucial in diagnosis, monitoring patient recovery, determining stability of the hip joint and in assessment of acetabular dysplasia. The decision for operative treatment is often based on different radiographic measurements and scores for which normal values are defined. Therefore orthopaedic surgeons often use combinations of measurements when assessing acetabular parameter. A number of authors have also shown that geometrical measurements of acetabulam differ with respect to age, sex, and race and even within regions. The size, shape and depth of the acetabulum are variable as reported by Govsa F et al., Therefore, the knowledge of various parameters of acetabulum would be helpful in performing surgical procedures such as acetabular reconstruction and planning reorientation procedures using spikes and screws for fixation.

  1. Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961;43:268?272.Google Scholar
  2. Laforgia R, Specchiulli F, Solarino G, Nitti L. Radiographic variables in normal and osteoarthritic hips. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 1996;54:215?221.Google Scholar
  3. Delaunay S, Dussault RG, Kaplan PA, Alford BA. Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips. Skeletal Radiol 1997;26:75?81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Li PL, Ganz R. Morphologic features of congenital acetabular dysplasia: one in six is retroverted. Clin Orthop 2003;416:245?53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Reiker?s O, Bjerkreim I, Kolbenstvedt A. Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in normals and in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand 1983;54:18?23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckley SL, Sponseller PD, Magid D. The acetabulum in congenital and neuromuscular hip instability. J Pediat Orthop 1991;11:498?501.Google Scholar
  7. Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad KA, Svenningsen S. Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:115?120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad KA. Computed tomography measurements of the acetabulum in adult dysplastic hips: which level is appropriate? Skeletal Radiol 1991;20:267?271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacquemier M, Jouve JL, Bollini G, Panuel M, Migliani R. Acetabular anteversion in children. J Pediat Orthop 1992;12:373?375.Google Scholar
  10. Anda S, Svenningsen S, Gr?ntvedt T, Benum P. Pelvic inclination and spatial orientation of the acetabulum: a radiographic, computed tomographic and clinical investigation. Acta Radiol 1990; 31:389?394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wientroub S, Boyde A, Chrispin AR, Lloyd-Roberts GC. The use of stereophotogrammetry to measure acetabular and femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981;63:209?213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fairbank JCT, Howell P, Nockler I, Lloyd-Roberts GC. Relationship of pain to the radiological anatomy of the hip joint in adults treated for congenital dislocation of the hip as infants: a long-term follow-up of patients treated by three methods. J Pediat Orthop 1986;6:539?547.Google Scholar
  13. Shiino K. ?ber die H?ftpfanne. Zeitschrift f?r Morphol und Anthropol 1914/1915;17:325?356.Google Scholar
  14. Murphy SB, Kijewski PK, Millis MB, Harless A. Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop 1990; 261:214?223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Lund B, S?balle K, Ki?r T, Rovsing H, et al. Pelvic orientation and assessment of hip dysplasia in adults. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:721?729.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. T?nnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:1747?1770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim SS, Frick SL, Wenger DR. Anteversion of the acetabulum in developmental dysplasia of the hip: analysis with computed tomography. J Pediat Orthop 1999;19:438?442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mast JW, Brunner RL, Zebrack J. Recognizing acetabular version in the radiographic presentation of hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop 2004;418:48?53.

[jawahar mehmood khan and jabreel muzaffar. (2018); A STUDY OF MEASUREMENT OF ACETABULAR INCLINATION ANGLE RADIOLOGICALLY IN NORTHERN INDIAN POPULATION OF JAMMU REGION. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Jun). 1092-1096] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Mohd Irfan Banday
NONE

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7315      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7315

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 12 | No. of Views: 63