16May 2018

COMMUNITY-MANAGED FORESTRY IN NEPAL: A REVIEW OF DOCUMENTARY FINDINGS.

  • UNEP TONGJI IESD, College of Environmental Science, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, P.R. China.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The review of 50 articles dealing with community forestry in Nepal provide with evidences of the significant influence of community forestry on several aspects of people?s life and development. The concept of the community forestry that underscores the value of institutional flexibility, community autonomy and participatory, itself is the a key to influence on the successes of community forest in the context of Nepal. The definition of the success of the community forestry is attributed to the impact it has created on biodiversity conservation, improvement of rural livelihood and welfare, empowerment of women and disadvantages people, contribution to sustainable development, increase in supply of forest product, wildlife protection, control on forest fire, grazing and over exploitation, its contribution to good governance and to local democracy. This paper analyses participatory approach on forest resource management and provides with sufficient evidence towards the success of community forest management practices in Nepal. Several studies on community forest management found that the major factor of forest development is the formulation of user's group to facilitate utilization of available forest resources with collective interest. Finding shows that nationally and internationally defined variables, indicators and principles have not been significantly practical in Nepal due to scientific and technical reasons. However, community forest management is the most successful concept implemented by the Government of Nepal which is one of the widespread and rapidly growing policy tool over the period where the community members are actively involved in the utilization of forest resources management and take benefits for the collective interest.


  1. CBS, 2011. Statistics of population for the year 2068(2011). Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal. (1).
  2. DOF, 2017. Community Forestry Bulletin, 2073 (2017). Department of Forests (DOF), Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal. (2).
  3. Bhattarai Binod, 2016. Community forest and forest management in Nepal. American journal of environmental protection. Vol.4(3),79-91. (3).
  4. Maharjan K.L. Community participation in forest resource management in Nepal. Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima., 194-206. (4).
  5. C. Dhurba Bijaya, S.Cheng, Z.Xu, J.Bhandari, L.Wang and X. Liu, 2016. Community forestry and livelihood in Nepal: A review paper, The journal of animal & plant sciences, 26(1), 1-12. (5).
  6. Pokharel B.K., Braney P., M. Nurse and Malla Y.B., 2007. Community forestry: Conserving forests, sustaining livelihoods and strengthening democracy. Journal of forest and livelihood 6(2), 8-19.
  7. Bromley, D. W. 1989. Economic interests and institutions: The conceptual foundations of public policy. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  8. Pandey Shiva Shankar, Geoff Cockfield, Tek Narayan Maraseni, 2016. Assessing the roles of community forestry in Climate change mitigation and adaptation: A case Study From Nepal. Forest ecology and management 360, 400-407.
  9. MOF, 2016. Economic Survey: Fiscal year 2015/16. Ministry of Finance (MOF), the Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  10. Oliver Springate-Baginski, Om Prakash Dev, Nagendra Prasad Yadav, John Soussan, 2003. Community forest management in the middle hills of Nepal: the changing context. Journal of forest and livelihood, 3 (1), 5-20.
  11. Pagdee A., Kim Y.S., Daugherty P.J., 2006. What makes? community forest management successful: A Meta-Study from community forests throughout the world. Society and natural resources (19):33-52.
  12. Wagle Mohan and Ojha Hemant (2002). Analyzing participatory trends in Nepal's community forestry, Policy trend report. Ministry of forest and soil conservation, Nepal. Page no. 122-142.
  13. Shrestha U. B., Shrestha B.B. and Shrestha Sujata, 2010. Biodiversity conservation in community forests of Nepal: Rhetoric and reality. Review, International journal of biodiversity and conservation Vol.2(5) 99-104. (23)
  14. Dahal D.S., 2014. A Review article on status and trends in forests and forestry development in Nepal: Major Success and Constraints. International journal of sciences 3 (5), 52-65
  15. Dahal D. S., Cao S., 2015. Sustainability assessment of community forests practices in Nepal: Literature review and recommendations to improve community management. The national academy of sciences, Dol (10) 0627-5.
  16. Liu J. and Innes J.L.,2015. Participatory forest management in china: Key challenges and ways forward. International forestry review. Vol.17(2)2015
  17. Kanel K. R. and Kandel B. R., 2004. Community forestry in Nepal: Achievements and challenges. Journal of forest and livelihood. 55-63.
  18. Neupane R. K., Wenying X., Zhigang L., Oskenbayeva A. and Nyyssonen V.,2017. Evaluating impact of community management in forest conservation: A study on community forestry in Nepal. International journal of advance research (IJAR),5(3) 701-711.
  19. Forest act 1993, Department of Forests (DOF), Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal. (2).
  20. Pokharel R.K., Suvedi M., 2007. Indicator for measuring the success of Nepal's community forestry program: A local perspective. Research in human ecology review, Vol.14(1).
  21. Wade, R. 1988. Village republics: Economic conditions for collective action in South India. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
  22. Baland, J.M. and J.P. Platteau. 1996. Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  23. Baland, J.-M. and J.-P. Platteau. 1999. The ambiguous impact of inequality on local resource management. World Dev. 27(5):773?788.
  24. Hanna, S. and M. Munasinghe. 1995a. Property rights and the environment: Social and ecological Issues. Washington, DC: ESD.
  25. Hanna, S. and M. Munasinghe. 1995b. Property rights in a social and ecological context: Case studies and design applications. Washington, DC: ESD.
  26. Ostrom, E. 1999. Self-governance and forest resources. Occasional Paper No. 20. Jakarta, Indonesia: CIFOR.
  27. Pye Smith, C., G. Borrini Feyerabend, and R. Sandbrook. 1994. The wealth of communities: stories of success in local environmental management. London: Earthscan.
  28. Harini N., Karmacharya M. and Karna.(2005). Ecology and society. Evaluating forest management in Nepal: Views across space and time. 10(1):24.
  29. Acharya K.P., 2004. Does community forests management support biodiversity conservation? Evidences from two community forests from the mid hills of Nepal. Journal of forests and livelihood 4(1).
  30. MFSC, 2011. State of Nepali's forest. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, (MFSC). Department of forest research and survey, forest resource assessment Nepal.
  31. MFSC, 2015. State of Nepali's forest. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, (MFSC). Department of forest research and survey, forest resource assessment Nepal.
  32. Acharya K., Gentle P., 2006. Improving the effectiveness of collective action: sharing experiences from community forestry in Nepal. CGIAR system-wide program on collective action and property rights.
  33. Adhikari U., 2011. Status of community forest and women. For the partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of masters in population, gender and development, Pokhara University, Nepal.
  34. Leone, M. (2013). Women as Decision Makers in Community Forest Management: Evidence from Nepal.
  35. Tachibana T. and Adhikari S.,2007. Care Nepal Lalitpur, Nepal. Does Community-based Management improve natural resource condition? Evidence from the forest in Nepal.
  36. Ojha H.R., Subedi B.P., Dhungana H., Paudel D. Citizen participation in forest Governance: Insights from community forestry in Nepal. page no. 1-10.
  37. C. D.B., Sheng-kui C., Qijie G., Xu Z., Wang L. Bhandari J. Liu Xiaojie, Gao Liwei and Cao Xiaochang(2015). Can community forestry play a major role in the socio-economic enhancement of poor users in Nepal? Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21(378-383).
  38. Bhattarai R.C., 2011. Economic impact of community forestry in Nepal: A case of mid-hill districts of Nepal. Economic Journal of development issues vol. 13 &14. 75-96.
  39. Pandey G.S. & Paudyal B.R., 2015. Community forestry in Nepal. Fern Protecting forests, improving livelihoods. page no.1-20
  40. Paudel N.R.,Fuwa N., Otsuka? , 2014. The impacts of a community forestry program on forest conditions, management intensity and revenue generation in the Dang district of Nepal. Environment and development economics. page no. 259-281.
  41. Pokharel B.K. and Nurse M. 2004. Forest and people's livelihood: Benefiting the poor from community forestry. Journal of forest and livelihood 4(1).
  42. Dev O.P., Yadav N.P., Baginski O.S., Soussan J., 2003. Impacts of community forestry on livelihoods in the middle hills of Nepal. Journal of forest and livelihood 3(1).
  43. Ojha HR, Cameron J, Kumar C (2009). Deliberation or symbolic violence? The governance in community forestry in Nepal. For. Pol. Econ. (doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.11.003)
  44. Pokharel and Tumbahangphe 1999. Community forestry development action: A synthesis of NUKCFP reports and publications. NUKCFP report, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  45. Ram Chandra Bhattarai 2011. Economic impact of community forestry in Nepal: A case of mid-hill districts of Nepal. Economic journal of development issues vol.13&14, 1-2.
  46. Pokharel, B.K., & Carter, J. (2007). Addressing chronic poverty and spatial poverty traps in Nepal's middle hills: the Nepal Swiss Community Forestry Project. Paper presented at the International Conference on Chronic and Spatial Poverty. Cape Town, South Africa, March 27, 2007.
  47. MSFP (2011). Economic appraisal. Multi-stakeholder forestry program (MSFP) Nepal.
  48. Klooster D. & Masera O. 2000. Community forest management in Mexico: carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development. Global environment change, (10), 259-272.
  49. Bhattacharya, P., Pradhan L., and Yadav G. (2010), ?Joint forest management in India: experiences of two decades?, Resources, Conservation, and Recycling 54(8): 469?480.

[Prabhat Bhattarai. (2018); COMMUNITY-MANAGED FORESTRY IN NEPAL: A REVIEW OF DOCUMENTARY FINDINGS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (May). 373-381] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Prabhat Bhattarai
Tongji University, Shanghai China

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7043      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7043