15Apr 2018

A STUDY OF THE FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERITY OF ROAD TRAFFIC INJURIES IN THE EMERGENCY MEDICINE DEPARTMENT IN KOLKATA, INDIA.

  • Institute Of Emergency Medicine, Peerless Hospital and B. K Roy Research Center Kolkata.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Introduction: World Health Organization defines road traffic injury (RTI) as a fatal or non fatal injury incurred as a result of a collision on a public road involving at least one moving vehicle and pedestrians. It is a major but neglected public health challenge that requires concerted efforts for effective and sustainable prevention. Worldwide, an estimated 1.2 million people are killed in road crashes each year and as many as 50 million are injured. Nevertheless, the tragedy behind these figures attracts less mass media attention than other, less frequent types of tragedy [1]. Aim: To study the Socio demographic Characteristics of the Study Population with Incidence of the Road Traffic Injury and Factors Associated with Road Traffic Injury. Methodology: This is a Institutional, prospective cross-sectional questioner based study conducted at the Emergency Department of peerless hospital and research centre kolkata. This study was conducted in the Emergency Department of Peerless Hospital And Research Centre Kolkata from March 2016, to August 30, 2017, hospital having a 24-hour Emergency Service after taking ethical clearance from ethical committe and proper consent. Results: Proportion of victim having conflict with family members (20.39%) is significantly lower than proportion not having any conflict with family members (79.61%) with P value 3.38e-09 (< 0.05); Proportion of victim with psychological problems (27.18%) is significantly lower than proportion without any psychological problems (72.82%) with P value 5.83e-06 (< 0.05); Proportion of victim uses alcohol (62.07%) is significantly higher than proportion not uses any alcohol (37.93%) with P value 0.03201 (< 0.05); Proportion of cases ambulance (21.36%) used as mode of transportation is significantly lower than the proportion other modes of transportation (78.64%) used with P value 1.098e-08 (< 0.05); Proportion of victims from poor (40.78%), middle (50.49%) and high (8.74%) financial status differ significantly with P value 3.937e-07 (< 0.05). Proportion of victims from high financial status is significantly lower than the middle with P value 3.679e-08 (<0.05) and also lower than poor with P value 3.82e-06 (< 0.05). Proportion of victims from poor and middle financial status do not vary significantly with P value 0.3023 (>0.05). Proportion of victim shifted to Healthcare centers by ambulance (21.36%, 95% CI 13.44% - 29.27%) is significantly lower than proportion shifted using other modes of transportation (78.64%, 95% CI 70.73% - 86.56%) with P value 1.098e-08 (< 0.05); Ambulance service as mode of transportation to Healthcare center of Mild (17.65% 95% CI 0.00% - 35.77%), Moderate (10.00%, 95% CI 0.00% - 24.26%) and severely (38.89%, 95% CI 15.72% - 62.06%) injured victims varies significantly with P value 0.005076 (>0.05). test statistic used chi-square test for proportions. Conclusion: Results clearly shows that a large number of people who came with RTA have alcohol influence but not related with severity of injury and the health care need to be improved in regard to transport facilities as it is clearly demonstrated that very less people use ambulance service for mode of transport.


  1. Margie Peden, World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention, 2004.
  2. Peden, World Report on Traffic Injury Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  3. World Health Organization, The Injury Chartbook: A Graphical Overview of the Global Burden of Injuries, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  4. A. Lyons, H. Ward, H. Brunt et al., ?Using multiple datasets to understand trends in serious road traffic casualties,? Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1406?1410, 2008.
  5. Mindell, L. Sheridan, M. Joffe,H. Samson-Barry, and S.Atkinson, ?Health impact assessment as an agent of policy change: improving the health impacts of the mayor of London?s draft transport strategy,? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 169?174, 2004.
  6. Peden, World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  7. World Population Prospects: The 2002 Revision Comprehensive Tables, United Nations, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  8. O. Mogaka, Z. Ng?ang?a, J. Oundo, J. Omolo, and E. Luman, ?Factors associated with severity of road traffic injuries, Thika, Kenya,? Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 8, article 20, 2011.
  9. WHO, Global Status Report on Road Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  10. How Safe are Ethiopian Roads? Ethiopian Roads Authority, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2005.
  11. Woldemichael and N. Berhanu, ?Magnitude and pattern of injury in jimma university specialized hospital, South West Ethiopia,? Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, vol. 21, no. 3, pp.155?165, 2011.
  12. Kumar, S. Lalwani, and D. Agrawal, ?Fatal road traffic accidents and their relationship with head injuries: an epidemiological survey of five years,? Indian Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 63?67, 2008.

[Sambit Maiti, Indraneel Dasgupta, Subhendu Das and Arif Ishtiq Mattoo. (2018); A STUDY OF THE FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERITY OF ROAD TRAFFIC INJURIES IN THE EMERGENCY MEDICINE DEPARTMENT IN KOLKATA, INDIA. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (Apr). 880-886] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


DR.SAMBIT MAITI
INSTITUTE OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE PEERLESS HOSPITAL AND B.K.ROY RESEARCH CENTER

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6924      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6924