30Dec 2017

CURRENT CLASSIFICATIONS AND PREPARATION TECHNIQUES OF DENTAL CERAMIC LAMINATE VENEERS (REVIEW ARTICLE).

  • Assistant professor, King Abdul Aziz University and BMC, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Post graduate dentist, Al-farabi College for Dentistry and Nursng, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Assistant prof. at Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi College for Dentistry and Nursng, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Lecturer at Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Assiut branch, Egypt.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The continuous progression in the field of ceramics in dentistry lead to a revolution in conservative dental treatment. This is offered the clinicians various solutions for many situations that need esthetic dental improvement. Laminate veneers considered highly functional and esthetically indirect restoratives that treat unaesthetic anterior teeth with minimally invasive preparation. Cases needed for correction of crown length and width, correction of minor malformations of anterior teeth, closure of spacing\ diastema, masking some intrinsic discoloration; e.g. Tetracycline stain and treatment of dental fluorosis are examples for solutions varieties that can be achieved when using ceramic laminate veneers. The more improvement in ceramic material, adhesive luting cement and preparation techniques offer many options for clinicians. The Success of clinical veneer cases relays to a great extent on a proper knowledge, and well training of both operator and technician. These can be achieved through more focusing on the recent trends in ceramic materials, preparation techniques and application of adhesive luting cement. The following review article is searching for the current state of the art of dental laminate veneers including veneers material, preparation modalities, and applications techniques.

  1. McLaren EA, Whiteman YY. Ceramics: rationale for material selection. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010; 31(9):666?668.
  2. McLaren EA, LeSage B. Feldspathic veneers: what are their indications? Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011; 32(3):44?49.
  3. Radz GM. Minimum thickness anterior porcelain restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 2011; 55(2):353?370.
  4. Belser UC, Magne P, Magne M. Ceramic laminate veneers: continuous evolution of indications. J Esthet Dent. 1997; 9(4):197?207.
  5. Strassler HE. Minimally invasive porcelain veneers: indications for a conservative esthetic dentistry treatment modality. Gen Dent. 2007; 55(7):686?694.
  6. Peumans B, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000; 28:163?177.
  7. MEDLINE? [database on the Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine; nd. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/. Accessed January 9, 2011.
  8. gov [database on the Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information, US Library of Medicine; nd. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/. Accessed January 9, 2011.
  9. Donovan T. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; Suppl 139:14S?18S.
  10. Soares CJ, Soares PV, Pereira JC, Fonseca RB. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-composite restorations: a literature review. J Esthet Rest Dent. 2005; 17: 224?235.
  11. Giordano R, McLaren EA. Ceramics overview: classification by microstructure and processing methods. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010; 31(9):682?684.
  12. Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrecht P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek V. Prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent. 2004; 6(1):65?76.
  13. Walls AW. The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during the management of fractured and worn anterior teeth. Part II: clinical results after 5-years follow-up. Br Dent J. 1995; 178:337?339.
  14. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; Suppl 139:8S?13S.
  15. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(3):559?570.
  16. Seydler B, Schimitter M. Esthetic restoration of maxillary incisors using CAD/CAM chairside technology ? a case report. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:533?537.
  17. Wittneben JG, Wright RF, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAN single-tooth restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:446?471.
  18. Wiedhahn K, Kerschbaum T, Fasbinder DF. Clinical long-term results with 617 Cerec veneers: a nine-year report. Int J Comput Dent. 2005;8:233?246.
  19. Culp L, McLaren EA. Lithium disilicate: the restorative material of multiple options. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31(9):716?720, 722, 724?725
  20. Narasimha Raghavan (2012). Ceramics in Dentistry, Sintering of Ceramics - New Emerging Techniques, Dr. Arunachalam Lakshmanan (Ed.), InTech, DOI: 10.5772/39090. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/sintering-of-ceramics-new-emerging-techniques/ceramics-in-dentistry
  21. Layton D, Walton T. An up to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(4):389?396.
  22. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation ? a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2005;25(1):9?17.
  23. Della Bona A. Bonding to Ceramics: Scientific Evidences for Clinical Dentistry. S?o Paulo: Artes M?dicas; 2009.
  24. McLaren EA, LeSage B. Feldspathic veneers: what are their indications??Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011;32(3):44?49.
  25. McLaren EA, Whiteman YY. Ceramics: rationale for material selection.?Compend Contin Educ Dent.?2010;31(9):666?668.
  26. Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success.?Dent Clin N Am.?2007;51:399?417.
  27. Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Ferencz J, Silva NRFA. All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(2):333?352.
  28. A. Malament, S.S. Socransky, "Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure". The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2001;86:511?519.
  29. A. Tsitrou, M. Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, R.van Noort, "A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns", J Dent. 2010;38(1):16-22.
  30. Denry, "How and when does fabrication damage adversely affect the clinical performance of ceramic restorations? " Dental Materials. 2013;29:85?96.
  31. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(3):559?570.
  32. Seydler B, Schimitter M. Esthetic restoration of maxillary incisors using CAD/CAM chairside technology ? a case report. Quintessence 2011;42:533?537.
  33. Berg NG, Derand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (CEREC). Swed Dent J. 1997;21(4):121-127.
  34. M?rmann WH. The evaluation of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137 (suppl):7S-13S.
  35. Duret F, Blonin J, Duret B. CAD/CAM in dentistry, JADA 1998; 117:715-720.
  36. Trifković B, Todorović A, Lazić V, Dragnjac M, Mirković N, Jokić B. Accuracy of optical scanning methods of the Cerec 3D system in the process of making ceramic inlays. Vojnosanit pregl 2010; 67(10): 795-876.
  37. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AHL, Phillips K, Nicholls JI, Kois JC. Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations.?J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(2):171?180.
  38. Akoğlu B, Gemalmaz D. Fracture resistance of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs.?J Prosthodont. 2011;20(5):380?384.
  39. Brunton PA, Aminian A, Wilson NH. Tooth preparation techniques for porcelain laminate veneers.?Br Dent J. 2000;189(5):260?262.
  40. Nattress BR, Youngson CC, Patterson CJ, Martin DM, Ralph JP. An in vitro assessment of tooth preparation for porcelain veneer restorations.?J Dent. 1995;23(3):165?170.
  41. Ferrari M, Patroni S, Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers.?Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(5):407?413.
42.? Parmeijer CH. Porcelain laminate veneers.?J Calif Dent Assoc. 1991; 19(4):59?62.
43. ?Weinberg LA. Tooth preparation for porcelain laminates.?N Y State Dent J. 1989;55(5):25?28.
44. ?Clyde JS, Gilmour A. Porcelain veneers: a preliminary review.?Br Dent J. 1988;164(1):9?14.
45. ?Chen JH, Shi CX, Wang M, Zhao SJ, Wang H. Clinical evaluation of 546 tetracycline-stained teeth treated with ???porcelain laminate veneers. J Dent. 2005;33(1):3?8. 46. ?Wells DJ. ?No-prep? veneers.?Inside Dent. 2010;6(8):56?60.
  1. Magne P, Belser UC. Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition-a Biomimetic Approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2002.
  2. Pini NP, Aguiar FH, Lima DA, Lovadino JR, Terada RS, Pascotto RC. Advances in dental veneers: materials, applications, and techniques.?Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2012;4:9?16.
49. Strassler HE, Weiner S. Seven to ten-year clinical evaluation of porcelain laminate veneers.?J Dent Res. 1995;74:176. 50. Dumfahrt H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part I ? Clinical procedure.?Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(6):505?513. 51. Aristidis GA, Dimitra B. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(3):185?189.

[Basem M Abuzenada, Ahmed Saleh Alanazi, Waseem M Al saydali, Ahmed M El-Marakby, Hasan A Koshak and Abdulaziz Ahmed Alharthi. (2017); CURRENT CLASSIFICATIONS AND PREPARATION TECHNIQUES OF DENTAL CERAMIC LAMINATE VENEERS (REVIEW ARTICLE). Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Dec). 1973-1979] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Ahmed Mohamed El-marakby
Assist. Prof. of Restorative Dental Science

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/6168      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6168

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 951 | No. of Views: 1769