22Aug 2017

COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS LIKE PAIN ON INJECCTION AND MYOCLONUS DURING INDUCTION WITH ETOMIDATE AND THIOPENTONE IN CARDIAC SURGERY PATIENTS.

  • Department of Anaesthesiology, S.B.K.S. M.I. & R.C., Sumandeep Vidhyapeeth, Piparia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Background: Several modifications have been applied to the ridge splitting with or without expansion technique to allow for implant placement in the atrophic ridges. Some studies utilized guided bone regeneration and others not. Aim: This systematic review will try to present the different studies discussing the effects of conjunction of bone grafting materials and/or membranes or not with the ridge splitting with or without expansion for patients having insufficient bucco-palatal ridge width. Methods: A thorough PUBMED (Medline) and COCHRANE databases search in addition to hand-search of journals of relevance was performed on related terms in the period from 1992 to 2016 and resulted in 3247 titles of which 21 abstracts were selected and collected as full articles for further evaluation while the rest were excluded by title or abstract. According to the inclusion criteria 14 studies were included and discussed in this article. Results: Of the 14 studies included in the present study only one study (cohort-retrospective) compared ridge splitting with/without expansion technique alone and with guided bone regeneration. Twelve studies applied guided bone regeneration while three studies did not.

  1. Lee AJ, S Atkinson, Rushman GB, NJH Davies. Lee's Synopsis of Anaesthesia. 11th Butterworth-Heinemann international; 1993; 157-170
  2. Stoelting RK, Simon MD, Hillier MB. Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic practice. 4th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins c ; 2006; 126-139,163-167
  3. Thomas E J Healy and Paul R Knight, Andrew R A Rushton and Robert Sneyo Wylie and Churchill-Davidson's A Practice of Anesthesia Seventh Edition, chapter 35 clinical pharmacology and anesthetic techniques 2003; 572-577
  4. Ronald D. Miller, J.G. Peter S,et al. Millers Anesthesia 6 Edition chapter 10 Intravenous non opioid anesthetic Elsevier Churchill Livingstone vol(l)s;317-355
  5. Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M, et al: Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 101:622-628, 2005
  6. Doenicke A, Gabanyi D, Lemce H, et al: [Haemodynamics and myocardial function after administration of three short-acting i.v. hypnotics, etomidate, propanidid, methohexital (author?s transl)]. Anaesthesist 23:108-115, 1974
  7. Hempelmann G, Piepenbrock S, Hempelmann W, et al: Influence of althesine and etomidate on blood gases (continuous PO2-monitoring) and hemodynamics in man. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 25:402-412,1974
  8. Rifat K, Gamulin Z, Gemperle M: [Etomidate: cardiovascular effects of a new intravenous anesthetic agent]. Can Anaesth Soc J 23:492-504, 1976
  9. Creagh O, Torres H, Rodriguez N, et al: Alpha-2B adrenergic receptor mediated hemodynamic profile of etomidate. P R Health Sci J 29:91-95, 2010
  10. Paris A, Philipp M, Tonner PH, et al: Activation of alpha 2Badrenoceptors mediates the cardiovascular effects of etomidate. Anesthesiology 99:889-895, 2003.

[Chanshetty Rajnish, Nimish Jain, Arun Kumar Haridas And Rama Upadhayaya. (2017); COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS LIKE PAIN ON INJECCTION AND MYOCLONUS DURING INDUCTION WITH ETOMIDATE AND THIOPENTONE IN CARDIAC SURGERY PATIENTS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Aug). 1368-1374] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

CHANSHETTY RAJNISH
SR, MD ANAESTHESIA

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5192      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5192

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 10 | No. of Views: 77