20Jul 2017

A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES FOR PRE-STERILIZATION OF DRILL BITS USED IN A HOSPITAL-BASED ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY DEPARTMENT.

  • Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, ITS-CDSR, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, U.P.
  • Post Graduate Student, Department of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Subharti Dental College, Meerut, U.P.
  • Professor, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, ITS-CDSR, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, U.P.
  • Professor and Head, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, ITS-CDSR, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, U.P.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Introduction: Infection control is a major issue in medicine and dentistry because of concern over communicable diseases transmitted in health care settings. Both dental personnel and patients are always at risk of communicating diseases during treatment. The use of effective infection control procedures in the dental office will prevent cross contamination that may extend to dentist, dental staff, dental technician and patients. The current study evaluated the effectiveness of different techniques for Pre-sterilization of burs used in a Hospital-based Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department. In material and method, four groups A, B, C, and D were made and sterilization of drill bits was done by mechanical scrubbing in group A, 2% glutaraldehyde in group B, 5 % phenol in group C and autoclaving in group D. After which microbiological evaluation of the drill bits are done in Blood Agar media and the microbial colony were counted in each group. Result: The result showed that for Group A the mean bacterial colony count is 62.10 ? 4.17, 72.80 ? 4.61 and 81.30 ? 5.35 at 24, 48 and 72 hours respectively. For group B the mean bacterial colony count was 4.50 ? 0.52, 5.70 ? 0.48 and 6.20 ? 0.91 at 24, 48 and 72 hours respectively. For group C the mean bacterial colony count was 2.80 ?0.78, 3.50 ? 0.52 and 3.80 ? 0.63 at 24, 48 and 72 hours respectively. For group D mean bacterial colony count was zero at all three intervals. Conclusion: Autoclave was highly effective in sterilization of drill bits followed by 5% phenol and 2% glutaraldehyde and manual scrubbing was not an effective method for sterilization of drill bits.


  1. The Department of Health (2009) Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary dental care practice. Available at : http : // www .dh.gov.uk/ en/ Publications and statistics/Lettersandcirculars/Firecode/DH_097330 (Accessed 10th September 2001).
  2. Omolara G, Sonny O, Eyitope O and Gbemisola A. Infection control knowledge and practices related to HIV among Nigerian dentists. J Infect Dev Ctries 2009; 3(8):604-610.
  3. Centres for Disease Control (1987) Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health care settings MMWR 36: 1s-18s.
  4. Garner JS (1996) Hospital infection control practices advisory committee guidelines for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infect Contr Hosp Epidemiolo 17: 53-80.
  5. Sajjanshetty S, Hugar D, Hugar S, Ranjan S and Kadani M. Decontamination methods used for?dental?burs - a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(6): 39-41.
  6. British Dental Association (2003) Infection Control in Dentistry- Advice sheet A12. Available at: http://universitydental.co.uk/resources/bda-cross-infection.pdf (Accessed 10th September 2011).
  7. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. ANSI/AAMI/ISO 2001: 10993-7.

[Heena Agarwal, Mohit Mangla, Lily Rajput, Madan Mohan Niranjan, Pankaj Kukreja and Sanjeev Kumar. (2017); A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES FOR PRE-STERILIZATION OF DRILL BITS USED IN A HOSPITAL-BASED ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY DEPARTMENT. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Jul). 1070-1074] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr. Heena Agarwal
Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, ITS-CDSR, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, U.P.

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4816      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4816