21Jun 2017

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, AND SELF-EFFICACY WITH MINERS? ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND BEHAVIOR.

  • State University Of Jakarta.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

This research is aim at determining relationship between indigenous knowledge, socioeconomic status, and self-efficacy with miners? environmentally sound behavior at Gold Mine in Gorontalo, North-East Indonesia. The method used was survey with a correlational study by involving 100 sample. There were four instruments which measured environmental sound behavior (rel. .906), indigenous knowledge (rel. .823), and self-efficacy (rel. .931). Data has been analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Research results revealed that there is positive and significant correlation among those variables, even though it has been controlled by second-order correlation, it is still significant among them. Therefore, it could be concluded that if environmentally sound behavior would be improved, then indigenous knowledge, socioeconomic status, and self-efficacy should be taken into consideration.

  1. Anderson, Lorin W. & David R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom?s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.
  2. Anita Woolfook, Educational Psychology. USA: Person Education, 2007.
  3. Bandura, (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.),Ensyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4, h. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Ensyclopedia of Mental Health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998). (Diakses 11 Desember 2014).
  4. Bernardin, John H. and Russel, E.A., Human Resource Management, An Experiential Approach, Graw Hill International Edition, Singapore: Mac Graw Hill Book Co, 1993.
  5. Boersema, Jan J. & Lucas Reijnders (ed), Principles of Environmental Sciences, USA: Springer Science, 2009.
  6. Bloom, Benyamin.C. et al. Taxonomy of Educational. Objectives The Classification of Educational Goals., Handbook 1, Cognitif Domain, New York: David Mc Kay Co, Inc, 1996.
  7. Chiras, Daniel D. Enviromental Science, Action for a Sustainabel Future, Third Edition. Colorado, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc, 1991.
  8. Craig C. Pinden, Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw Hill, 2008.
  9. Colquitt, Jason A, Lepine Jeffery A, Wesson Michael J., Organizational Behavior, Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2009.
  10. Dunlap, Riley E., Kent D. Van Liere, Angela G. Mertig, Robert Emmet Jones, ?Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale? Journal of Social Issues, Vol, 56, No.3, 2000, pp. 425-427.
  11. Don Hellriegel & John W. Slocum, Organizational Behaviour, 13th USA: Cengage Learning, 2010.
  12. Eldon D, Enger&Bradley F. Smith, Environmental Science A Study of Interrelationships, New York: The McGraw-Hill,
  13. Fred Luthans, dkk. Psychological Capital: Developing The Human Competitive Edge. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  14. Gordon, Judith. R., A Diagnostic Approach to Organizational Behavior Boston Allyn and Bacon, 1991.
  1. Grant, Lyle, Principles of Behavior Analysis. New York: Harper Collins College Publisher, 1994.
  2. Gross, M. & Harald Heinrichs, Environmental Sociology European Perspectves and Interdisciplinary Challenges, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg. London, 2010.
  3. Guez, Wilma and John Allen, Behaviour Modification. Uganda: Winsome Gordon, 2000.
  4. Heckhausen, Jutta, & Heinz Heckhausen, Motivation and Action, Irvine: University of California, 1988.
  5. Jerald Greenberg & Robert A. Baron, Behavior In Organizations. New Jersey of Canada: Prentince-Hall, Inc. 2000.
  6. Krech D., and Gratchfiel, K. S, Teory and Problem Social Psykology. New York: McGraw hall Book Company, Inc, 1962.
  7. McShane & Von Glinow. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, International edition, 2010.
  8. Naeem, Shahid & Robert Costanza, ?Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning Maintaining Natural Life Support Processes? Journal Issues in Ecology. No .4. 1999.
  9. Odum, Eugene. P., Fundamentals of Ecology Third Edition. Copyright, 1993.
  10. Ritzer, George., Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Inc, 2010.
  11. Robbins, Stephen, & T. Judges. Essentials of Organizational Behavior. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall international, Inc, 2007.
  12. Roberts D. & T. M Roberts, Planning and Ecology. London: Chapma, 1994.
  13. Robert Kreitner & Angelo Knicky, Organizational Behavior 8th New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 2008.
  14. Santrock, J. W., Educational Psychology (2nd ed), New York: McGraw Hill Companies,Inc., 2004.
  15. Schermerhorn, al.Organizational Behavior 11th Edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
  16. Solso, Robert L., Cognitive Psychology, Boston: Allya and Bacon, 1991.
  17. Truk, Jonathan, Amos Truk, & Karen Arms, Enviromental Science,Third Edition, New York: CBS College Publishing, 1994.
  18. Vallerand, Robert J. et. al, Ajzen and Fishbein?s Theory of Reasoned Action as Applied to Moral Behaviour: A Confirmatory Analysis (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, Vol. 62, No. 1, 98-109, American Psychological Association, Inc), h.100.
  19. Wali, Mohan K., Fatih Evrendilek, & M. Siobhan Fennessy.The Environment: Science, Issues and Solutions, Boca Raton, FLU: CRC Press, 2010.
  20. Woolfolk, Anita E., Educational Psychology. USA: Person Education, 2007.

[Sahmin Madina. (2017); RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, AND SELF-EFFICACY WITH MINERS? ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND BEHAVIOR. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Jun). 1153-1160] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Sahmin Madina
Doctorate Student of Environmental Education , State University of Jakarta

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4522      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4522

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 8 | No. of Views: 76