15May 2017

PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY: INDICATION, OUTCOMES, AND COMPLICATION.

  • Third year resident doctor, department of ophthalmology, ssg hospital Vadodara.
  • Senior resident doctor, department of ophthalmology,ssg hospital Vadodara.
  • Associate professor department of ophthalmology, ssg hospital Vadodara.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Purpose:This study is a modest and a humble attempt done with purpose of: analyzing the overall survival rate of corneal transplants, studying the various factors influencing the survival of the graft and studying the post-operative complications and correlating it with the several pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors. Methods: This prospective case note review identified 50 penetrating keratoplasties [25: Optical & 25: Therapeutic] performed during a period from Sept.2015 to Aug.2016 at S. S. G. Hospital, Vadodara (India). All the patients were followed for a minimum period of 3 months. Throughout the statistical analysis, the patients were divided into two major groups: Optical and Therapeutic. Preoperative risk factor, surgical technique, postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: Maximum incidence of KP [52%] was seen in the age group >60 years [males and females inclusive].Most frequent indication for OKP in the study cases was corneal leucomatous opacities [44%], followed by Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy [32%]. The age of majority of donor eyeballs was more than 60 years [68%] or between 41-60 years [26%] {Total: 94%}. The most common post-operative complications noticed were Vascularization [44%] Immune rejection [34%] glaucoma [26% ]Uveitis [14%] and infection [20%]. The most probable causes of failure in Optical and Therapeutic cases were: Complications after surgery, Immune rejection reaction and Primary Endothelial failure.


  1. DrNoopur Gupta, Dr Radhika Tendon. Burden of Corneal blindness in India .INDIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 2013 Oct-Dec; 38(4):198-206.
  2. DrAparna c Varghese .Outcomes of a Large Series of Penetrating Keratoplasty in a Tertiary Eye Care Centre ?A 6 year Retrospective Study. Department .of Ophthmology, Little Flower Hospital ANGAMALAY, 2009 Dec; 23,387-395.
  3. Dr Lloyd Paul Aiello. National Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty. JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993 April; 111(4)509-513
  4. I Rahman, F Carley. Penetrating Keratoplasty: indication, outcomes, and complications. Department of ophthalmology, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital UK (2009) Feb; 23, 1288-1294
  5. Killingworth DW. Results of Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty .Department of ophthalmology, Univ.Florida coll. Medicine, 1993; Vol.100, 534-541
  1. Hughes WF. Complications after Corneal Transplantation. American journal of ophthalmology 1966; 61:1171
  2. Bright bill FS. Corneal surgery; theory technique and tissue; 1986.
  3. A. Casey, D.J.Mayer. Corneal grafting; principal and practice; 1984.
  4. A K Khurana. Comprehensive OPHTHALMOLOGY. Fourth Edition 2010; 4(5)124-126
  5. India has largest blind population ...The Times OF India; 2007: Oct 11,
  6. Corneal astigmatism after Penetrating Keratoplasty. The role of suture technique: DC Musch et al: Opthalmology, Vol 95. 15041508. AAO
  7. Combined interrupted and continuous versus single continuous adjustable suturing in penetrating keratoplasty; a prospective, randomized study of induced astigmatism during the first postoperative year. CH Karabatsas et al: Ophthalmology, Vol 101,113-119,AAO 1994.
  8. Cataract Formation and Cataract Extraction after Penetrating Keratoplasty: TP Martin et al: Ophthalmology, Vol 97, 934- 938, AAO [1990]
  9. Corneal Epithelium following Penetrating Keratpolasty: K Tsubota, Y Mashima et al: British Journal of Ophthalmology, 192, Vol 76, 98-100.
  10. Corneal Grafting: Principles and Practice, T.A Casey, D.J.Mayer, Philadelphia, 1984, WBSaunders& Co.
  11. Corneal Surgery: Theory, Technique and Tissue: edited by Brightbill FS. 1986, CV Mosby and Company

[Pawan N. Jarwal, Parth A. Leuva and S.S. Ganvit (2017); PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY: INDICATION, OUTCOMES, AND COMPLICATION. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (May). 297-303] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr Pawan N Jarwal
resident doctor

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4111      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4111