EAR WAX REMOVAL: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFICACY AND ASSOCIATED COMPLICATIONS OF DISTILLED WATER, NORMAL SALINE AND 2% PARA DICHLOROBENZENE.
- Resident ENT, SMHS Hospital, Srinagar,J&K,India.
- Resident ENT,SKIMS Medical College & Hospital, Srinagar,J&K,India.
- Assistant Professor,Deptt. Of Medicine, SMHS Hospital, Srinagar,J&K,India.
- Abstract
- References
- Cite This Article as
- Corresponding Author
Excessive ear wax can lead to symptoms such as hearing loss, tinnitus, itching, vertigo, and pain. There are many treatment options available for removal of impacted ear wax. The ceruminolytic effect of distilled water and 2% para-dichlorobenzene ear drops has been compared in this study. Aims & Objective: (1) To compare the ceruminolytic effect of distilled water,normal saline and commercially available 2% para-dichlorobenzene ear drops; (2) To observe and analyze the complications during the usage of these agents. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients who attended the ENT OPD and were diagnosed to have impacted ear wax completely occluding the ear canal were included in the study. They were divided into three groups ? Group A,Group B and Group C. Group A patients were advised to use distilled water as ear drops, Group B patients were advised to use normal saline as ear drops and Group C were adcised to use comercailly available 2% para-dichlorobenzene ear drops. Results: From the results it is clear that using distilled water and normal saline as ear drops does lead to significantly more complications and pain during removal than 2% Para dichlorobenzene ear drops. The results also point that removal becomes significantly easier when distilled water and normal saline is used compared to 2% Para dichlorobenzene. No statistically significant difference has been noted in the number of attempts required to achieve complete removal between the two groups. Complications included perforation, canal lacerations, and failure of wax removal. The removal of occlusive wax improved hearing by a mean of 5 dB over the frequencies analysed. Conclusion: The results indicate that the usage of distilled water and normal saline on a regular basis as a ceruminolytic ear drop cannot be recommended.
- Alberti PW. Epithelial migration on the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol 1964;78:808-30.
- Roland PS, Smith TL, Schwartz SR, Rosenfeld RM, Ballachanda B, Earll JM, et al. Clinical practice guideline: cerumen impaction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139:S1-S21.
- Freeman RB. Impacted cerumen: how to safely remove earwax in an office visit. Geriatrics 1995;50:52?3.
- Crandell CC, Roeser RJ. Incidence of excessive impacted cerumen in individuals with mental retardation: A longitudinal investigation. Am J Ment Retard 1993;97:568-74.
- Prasad KS. Cardiac depression on syringing the ear. 7 Laryngol Otol 1984;98: 1013.
- Jacobsen E, Billings JK, Frantz RA, Kinney CK, Stewart ME, Downing DT. Age related changes in sebaceous wax secretion in men and women. J Invest Dermatol 1985;85:483-5.
- Stone M, Falghum RS. Bacteriological activity of wet cerumen. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984;93:183-6.
- Nair P, Golhar S, Baisakhiya N, Deshmuk PT. A Comparative study of ceruminolytic agents. Ind J Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg 2009; 61:185-92.
- Jacobsen E, Billings JK, Frantz RA, Kinney CK, Stewart ME, Downing DT. Age related changes in sebaceous wax secretion in men and women. J Invest Dermatol 1985;85:483-5.
- Cipriani C, Taborelli G, Gaddia G, Melagrana A, Rebora A. Production rate and composition of cerumen-Influence of sex and season. Laryngoscope 1990;100:275-6.
[Arshed Ali, Asif Mahajan and Mohammad Ashraf. (2017); EAR WAX REMOVAL: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFICACY AND ASSOCIATED COMPLICATIONS OF DISTILLED WATER, NORMAL SALINE AND 2% PARA DICHLOROBENZENE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Apr). 1802-1805] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com
ResidentSMHS Hospital, Govt. Medical College Srinagar J & K,India