EVALUATING IMPACT OF COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT IN FOREST CONSERVATION: A STUDY ON COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM IN NEPAL.
- UNEP TONGJI IESD, College of Environmental Science, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, 200092, P.R. China.
- Abstract
- Keywords
- References
- Cite This Article as
- Corresponding Author
Expansion of agricultural land, the growing demand for timberand the local dependency on forest firewood created long term pressure for deforestation in Nepal. Thispaper investigated the impact of community management on forest conservation and outlines the conversiontrend of the forest outlook in Nepal in the past decades by informal interviewing 10 representative Community Forest Users Groups (CFUGs) from the middle hills of the country. The results showed notable positive changesincluding increased forest cover, improved forest product supply and enhanced biodiversity after implementation of the community forestryprogram. The main factor behind the forest restoration is sustainable management adopted by the community and control on forest fire and over exploitation.However, the adopted conservative-oriented approach hampers communities to exploit the maximum benefits. It has been recommended that market-oriented approach would help communities to get more economic benefit than the existing approach. The community led initiative in Nepal has set best example in forest conservation and this experience can be explored by other countries as well.Local people's participation is very important and necessary for common resources management. The research results provide fundamental basis for policy making process regarding common pool resources management and forest governance.
- Acharya, K. P. 2002. Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal. International Forestry, Review 4: 149–156.
- Acharya, K. P., 2004. Does community forests management supports biodiversity conservation? Evidences from two community forests from the mid hills of Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 4(1), 44-54.
- Adhikari, B., Williams, F., & Lovett, J. C., 2007. Local benefits from community forests in the middle hills of Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(5), 464-478.
- Bijaya, G., Cheng, S., Xu, Z., Bhandari, J., Wang, L., & Liu, X., 2016. COMMUNITY FORESTRY AND LIVELIHOOD IN NEPAL: A REVIEW. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 26(1).
- Birch, J. C., Thapa, I., Balmford, A., Bradbury, R. B., Brown, C., Butchart, S. H., Pandeya, B. (2014). What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 8, 118-127.
- Bista, R., Gurung, A., Karki, R., Shrestha, S., & Uprety, D. R., 2012. Opportunities and challenges of adopting community forestry: a case study of Nepal. Agricultural Advances, 1(6), 156-163.
- Carter, J., Pokharel, B., & Parajuli, R., 2011. Two decades of community forestry in Nepal: what have we learned. Two decades of community forestryin Nepal: what have we learned. Available at:http://theredddesk.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdf/2011/community_forestry_nepal.pdf (accessed 20.10.16).
- DFRS, 1999. Forest Resources of Nepal, Forest Resources of Nepal (1987–1998).Publication No. 74. Department of Forest Research and Survey and Forest Resource Information System Project, the Government of Finland.
- DFRS, 2015.State of Nepal's Forests, Forest Resource Assessment (FRA) Nepal. Department of Forest Research and Survey (DFRS), Kathmandu, Nepal.
- Gautam, A., Shivakoti, G., & Webb, E., 2004.A review of forest policies, institutions, and changes in the resource condition in Nepal. International Forestry Review, 6(2), 136-148.
- Gurung, A., Bista, R., Karki, R., Shrestha, S., Uprety, D., & Oh, S.-E., 2013.Community-based forest management and its role in improving forest conditions in Nepal. Small-scale forestry, 12(3), 377-388.
- Kanel, K. R., & Kandel, B. R., 2004.Community forestry in Nepal: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 4(4), 55-63.
- KC, B., Stainback, G. A., & Rayens, K., 2015. Comparison of Three Major Forest Types of Mid Hills Region of Nepal for Conservation and Local Benefits. Small-scale forestry 14(4), 479-491.
- MFSC, 2013. Persistence and Change: Review of 30 years of Community Forestry in Nepal. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Multi stakeholder Forestry Program, the Government of Nepal.
- MOF ,2014.Economic Survey: Fiscal year 2013/14. Ministry of Finance (MOF), the Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
- MOF, 2016.Economic Survey: Fiscal year 2015/16. Ministry of Finance (MOF), the Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
- Nagendra, H., Karmacharya, M.,& Karna, B., 2005. Evaluating forest management in Nepal: views across space and time. Ecology and Society, 10(1).
- Nepal, C., 2006. Improving the effectiveness of collective action: Sharing experiences from community forestry in Nepal . Available at: http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/32951 (accessed 11.12.16)
- NSCFP, 2011. Two Decades of Community Forestry in Nepal: What Have We Learned?. Nepal Swiss Community Forestry Project.
- NSI, 2016.The study on the assessment of forestry sector's contribution in national economy and environmental conservation in Nepal. National statistical Institute, Kathmandu Nepal. Available at: http://www.msfp.org.np/uploads/publications/file/87_20160927040451.pdf(accessed 02.01.17)
- Ojha, H., Persha, L., & Chhatre, A., 2009. Community forestry in Nepal: A policy innovation for local livelihoods (Vol. 913): Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
- Ojha, H. R., B. Subedi, H. Dhungana, and D. Paudel, 2008. Citizen participation in forest governance: Insights from community forestry in Nepal, Paper presented at the Conference on “Environmental Governance and Democracy,” 2008, Yale University, U.S.A.
- Pandey, Ghan Shyam, & Paudyall, Bijaya Raj, 2015. Protecting forests, improving livelihoods – Community forestry in Nepal. Global Alliance of Community Forestry, Green Foundation Nepal.
- Pandit, R., & Bevilacqua, E., 2011. Forest users and environmental impacts of community forestry in the hills of Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(5), 345-352.
- Pokharel, B. K., Branney, P., Nurse, M., & Malla, Y. B., 2007. Community forestry: Conserving forests, sustaining livelihoods and strengthening democracy. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 6(2), 8-19.
- Pokharel, B. K., and M. Nurse, 2004. Forests and people’s livelihood: Benefiting the poor from community forestry. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 4: 19–29.
- Pokharel, R. K., & Suvedi, M., 2007. Indicators for measuring the success of Nepal's community forestry program: A local perspective. Human Ecology Review, 14(1), 68.
- Poudel, N. R., Fuwa, N., & Otsuka, K., 2015. The impacts of a community forestry program on forest conditions, management intensity and revenue generation in the Dang district of Nepal. Environment and Development Economics, 20(02), 259-281.
- Shrestha, R., & Abington, J. , 1992. Agroecosystem of the mid-hills. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/t0706e/T0706E02.htm. (accessed 24.12.2016).
- Springate-Baginski, O., Dev, O. P., Yadav, N. P., & Soussan, J., 2003. Community forest management in the middle hills of Nepal: the changing context. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 3(1), 5-20.
- Wagley, M., & Ojha, H., 2002. Analyzing participatory trends in Nepal's community forestry. Policy Trend Report, 2002, 122-142.
- WECS, 2010, Energy Sector Synopsis Report, 2010. Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS), Kathmandu, Nepal.
- Yadav, N. P., Dev, O. P.,Springate-Baginski, O., & Soussan, J. , 2003. Forest management and utilization under community forestry. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 3(1), 37-50.
[Ramesh Kumar Neupane, Wenying Xu, Zhigang Liu, Oskenbayeva Aidana and Ville Nyyssonen. (2017); EVALUATING IMPACT OF COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT IN FOREST CONSERVATION: A STUDY ON COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROGRAM IN NEPAL. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Mar). 701-711] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com
UNEP TONGJI IESD, College of Environmental Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, Chaina