04Mar 2019

FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS: POSSIBLE LEGAL BASES FOR THE HUMAN-ROBOT RELATIONSHIPS IN THE FUTURE.

  • Dsc. Ph.D., Associate Professor; Technical University, Rzeszow, Poland.
  • Ph.D., Assistant ProfessorIstanbulCommerce University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

In the future, robots will increasingly resemble human beings and people will engage in social interaction with them. Accordingly, this paper aims to pave the way for analyse the research problem in the case of social robots, the probable legal status of artificial intelligence in the future. The article will discuss the differences between artificial intelligence versus artificial consciousness because AI poses societal challenges so it is currently undergoing a number of important developments and the law must be rapidly changed in society so that firstly, the difference between artificial intelligence and artificial consciousness is attempted to be demystified. Subsequently, the analysis will be subjected to a current legal status of Artificial Intelligence in EU with particular emphasis on case-law in matters of intellectual property. Also possible future scenarios will be discussed in this article The starting point of the research were source queries and literature studies aimed at jointly defining competence profiles of robot-human and key from the point of view of cybersecurity challenges 4.0. Next, the most important legal and political EU programming documents were analysed and assessed in terms of their vision of society 4.0. Next, a decision-making method was used to see the impact of particular instruments applied by the union in the framework of the policy of cyberspace protection and the phenomenon of robot-human relations. In connection with this, the following basic questions arise: firstly, the direction in which contemporary policy of combating cyber-terrorism should be aimed at institutional and legal matters, and secondly, to what extent well-guided cyber-security policy is able to influence the security of relations robot-human?

  1. Acemoglu, D., Restrepo, P. (2018), Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work, NBER Working Paper 24196.
  2. Bar-Cohen, Y., Hanson, D., &Marom, A. (2009). The Coming Robot Revolution: Expectations and Fears About Emerging Intelligent, Humanlike Machines. New York: Springer.
  3. Barta J., Markiewicz R. (1993), The main problems of computer law.
  4. Barfield, W. (2015). Cyber-Humans: Our Future with Machines .Chaphel Hill: Springer.
  5. Bartneck Ch., Forlizzi J. (2004), A Design-Centred Framework for Social HumanRobot Interaction.
  6. Bello, P., &Lokhorst, G.-J.(2011). Current Trends i Robotics. P. Lin, K. Abney, G.
  7. Bogdashina, O. (2013). Autism and Spirituality: Psyche, Self and Spirit in People on the Autism Spectrum. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  8. Bostrom P. (2014), Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.
  9. Buning, de Cock M, Briun R. (2017), Autonomous intelligent cars: proof that the EPSRC Principles are future-proof.
  10. Cat D. (1999), [in:] Barta J., Markiewicz R. Copyright law and technical progress.
  11. CJEU Order C-5/08 Infopaq International A/S v Danske DagbaldesForening
  12. Clark, Smyth (1997), Intellectual Property Law in Ireland Dublin.
  13. Dieter Schmalstieg, &Hollerer , T. (2016). Augmented Reality: Principles and Practice. New York: Pearson Education.
  14. Darling K. (2012), Extending Legal Rights to Social Robots.
  15. Donelan, H., Kear, K., &Ramage , M. (2012). Online Communication and Collaboration: A Reader . New York: Taylor & Francis.
  16. Ersoy, ?. (2017). Robotlar, YapayZekaveHukuk. İstanbul: On İkiLevha.
  17. Fandango, A. (2017). Python Data Analysis . Birmingham: Packt Publishing.
  18. Filipowicz T. (2015).,Zasadar?wnegotraktowaniawykonawc?w w zam?wieniachpublicznychdotyczącychtechnologiiinformatycznych.
  19. Goldstein, S., Princiotta, D., &Naglieri, J. A. (2014). Handbook of Intelligence: Evolutionary Theory, Historical Perspective, and Current Concepts. New York: Springer.
  20. Graaf M. (2016), An Ethical Evaluation of Human?Robot Relationships, Int J of SocRobotics .
  21. Glasser D (2001)., Copyrights in Computer-Generated Works: Whom, If Anyone, do We Reward?.
  22. Grimmelmann J. (2016), Copyright for Literate Robots.
  23. Guadamuz A. (2017), Artificial intelligence and copyright https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/05/article_0003.html
  24. Hancock, G. (2015). The Divine Spark: Psychedelics, Consciousness and the Birth of Civilization .Carsbad: Hay House.
  25. Hansell, G. R., &Grassie, W. (2011). H+/-: Transhumanism and Its Critics. Philadelphia: Metanexus Institute.
  26. Henriques, G. (2011). A New Unified Theory of Psychology . New York: Springer.
  27. Hobbes, T. (1651).Leviathan . Overland Park: Digireads.com Publishing .
  28. Izard, C. E. (1991). The Psychology of Emotions. New York: Springer.
  29. Jaynes, J. (1976). The Origin of the Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind . New York: Mariner Books.
  30. Kakoudaki, D. (2014). Anatomy of a Robot: Literature, Cinema, and the Cultural Work of Artificial . New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  31. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near. London: Viking Penguin.
  32. Lambert P. (2017), Computer Generated Works and Copyright: Selfies, Traps, Robots, AI and Machine Learning.
  33. Lavender, I. (2011). Race in American Science Fiction . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  34. Leach, R. (2015). Political Ideology in Britain . London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  35. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization . New York: Oxford University Press.
  36. Malle B.F., Scheutz M., Arnold T., Voiklis J., Cusimano C. (2015) Sacrifice one for the good of many? People apply different moral norms to human agents, Porland.
  37. Mamak K. (2017), Prawo karne przyszłości, Wolter Kluwer, Warsaw.
  38. Markiewicz R. (2015) , Playing with copyright.
  39. Matusiak A. (2013) , Computer game.
  40. Metzinger, T. (1995).Conscious Experience. Lawrence: Imprint Academic Sch?ningh.
  41. Miller, J. M. (2009). 21st Century Criminology: A Reference Handbook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  42. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., &Lampel , J. (2013). Strategy Bites Back: It is far more, then you imagined. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  43. M?ller, V. C. (2016). Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence . New York: Springer.
  44. Nilsson, N. J. (2010). The Quest for Artificial Intelligence. New York: Chambridge University Press.
  45. Nowicka A. (2003), [in:] J. Barta (ed.), System prawaprywatnego, t. 13, Prawoautorskie.
  46. Okon Z. (2015) [in:] Flisak D (ed.), Prawoautorskieiprawapokrewne. Komentarz.
  47. Radoniewicz F. (2009), Ochronaprogram?wkomputerowych w prawie UE (cz. I).
  48. Rajaraman V. (2014), John McCarthy ? Father of Artificial Intelligence.
  49. Pagallo, U. (2013). The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts . New York: Springer.
  50. Rhem, A. J. (2005). UML for Developing Knowledge Management Systems . Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  51. Rose, G. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Davos Reader . Davos: Council on Foreign Relations.
  52. Sanderson, C., &Gruen, R. (2006).Analytical Models for Decision-Making. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
  53. Sartre, J.-P. (2002). Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions . London: Routledge.
  54. Sarowski Ł. (2017), Robot społeczny ? wprowadzenie do zagadnienia, rocznikikulturoznawcze.
  55. Scheutz M. (2012) The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and socially interactive robots [in:] Lin P., Abney K., Bekey G.A. (eds.) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics.
  56. Shettleworth, S. J. (2010). Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  57. Soraker, J. H., & Steinhart, E. (2013). Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. London: Springer.
  58. Stuglik A. (2002), Program komputerowyainneutwory z zakresuinformatyki. the English case of Nova Productions v Mazooma Games [2007].
  59. Thierauf, R. J. (2002). Effective Business Intelligence Systems. Westport: Oxford University Press.
  60. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other . New York: RHYW.
  61. Turing A. (2018), Computing Machinery and Intelligence, http://phil415.pbworks.com/f/TuringComputing.pdf
  62. Wilber, K. (2002). The Spectrum of Consciousness . Delhi: Theosophical Publishing House.
  63. W?jtowicz E. (2015), W stronędolinyniesamowitości [in:] Zawojski P. (ed.) Bio-techno-logicznyświat: bioartorazsztukatechnonaukowa w czasachposthumanizmuitranshumanizmu.
  64. Papers must be sent in electronic format (DOC) to the editorial board at the following address: submission_paper@amp.ase.ro, using the following form for.

[Izabela Oleksiewicz and Mustafa Emre Civelek. (2019); FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS: POSSIBLE LEGAL BASES FOR THE HUMAN-ROBOT RELATIONSHIPS IN THE FUTURE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Mar). 254-263] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Izabela OLEKSIEWICZ
Associate Professor; Technical University, Rzeszow, Poland.

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8629      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8629

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 50 | No. of Views: 132