31Jul 2017

METASTATIC BEHAVIOUR OF SUBTYPES IN LOCALLY ADVANCED CARCINOMA BREAST.

  • Department of radiotherapy, PgimerChandigarh.
  • Department of general surgery, PgimerChandigarh.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Introduction:-Prognostic factors have been known to predict the incidence of metastasis in carcinomabreast but the study of subtypes classification based on molecular markers may help in providing more personalized and individualized patient care with a more focused treatment andfollow up of patients with high probability of metastasis at different sites. Methods:-Patients with breast cancer (tissue biopsy proven) diagnosed between 2011 and 2013 were included. Subtypes were defined on the basis of molecular markers (ER, PR and Her 2 Neu) in five categories. (Luminal A, Luminal B, Luminal HER2, HER2 enriched and Basal). Distant sites for metastasis were classified as brain, liver, lung, bone, distant nodal, pleural/peritoneal, and others. Association between the site of relapse and subtype was assessed in multivariate models using logistic regression. Results:-Mean age of diagnosis of patients in the study was 50.71 years (SD-11.493) with 41-50 years(31.5%) being the most common age group. Most of the patients in the study were locally advanced at the time of presentation (69.6%).Incidence of metastasis at the time of presentation was (38.7%) with bone being the most common site. Patients were divided on the basis of molecular subtypes with Basal(27.3%) being the most common subtype closely followed by luminal A(25.2%). Highest incidence of metastasis was seen in Basal subtype (33%) followed by Luminal HER (18.4%) and HER2 Enriched (18.1%). On subset analysis, Bone was the most common site of recurrence in Luminal A (61.5%) and Luminal B (58.8%). Basal and Luminal HER subtypes had Brain as the most common site of metastasis while HER2 Enriched had equal metastasis in liver and brain. Conclusion:-Breast cancer subtypes are associated with distinct patterns of metastatic spread with a high probability of metastasis at the time of presentation as well as later in the life time. Hormone negativetumours had more incidence of metastasis than hormone positive tumours. Moreover, hormonal negative tumours were dominated by visceral metastasis than bony metastasis. It is important to understandthe nuances of these subtypes to predict metastatic behavior, for early imaging and adequate individualized treatment and follow up.


  1. Hellman, S. & Harris, J. R. in Diseases of the Breast (eds Harris, J. R., Lippman, M. E., Morrow, M. & Osborne, C. K.), 407?423 (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000).
  2. Alanko A, Heinonen E, Scheinin T, et al: Significance of estrogen and progesterone receptors, disease-free interval, and site of first metastasis on survival of breast cancer patients. Cancer 56:1696-1700, 1985
  3. Chia S, Norris B, Speers C, et al: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression as a prognostic factor in a large tissue microarray series of node-negative breast cancers. J ClinOncol 26:5697-5704, 2008
  4. Hess KR, Pustazai L, BuzdarAU, Hortogabyi GN: Estrogen receptors and distinct patterns of breast cancer relapse Breast cancer Res Treat 2003,78:105-118
  5. Hagen Kennecke, RinatYerushalmi, Ryan Woods, Maggie Chon U. Cheang, David Voduc, Caroline H. Speers, Torsten O. Nielsen, and Karen Gelmon Metastatic Behavior of Breast Cancer Subtypes J ClinOncol 28:3271-3277.
  6. Schmalhofer O, Brabletz S, Brabletz T: E-Cadherin, beta catenin and ZEB1 in malignant progression of cancer: Cancer Metastasis Rev 2009 1-2: 151-166
  7. Pantel K, Alix-Panabieres C, Riethdorf S: Cancer micrometastases. Nat Rev ClinOncol 6:339-351,2009
  8. M. Barnes, ?C-erbb-2 amplification in mammary-carcinoma,? Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 17, pp. 132?138, 1993
  9. Defining prognosis for women with breast cancer and CNS metastases by HER2 status. Ann Oncol 19:1242-1248, 2008
  10. Kedrin D, Wyckoff J, Boimel PJ, Coniglio SJ, Hynes NE, Arteaga CL, Segall JE: ERBB1 and ERBB2 have distinct function in tumour cell invasion and intravasation.
  11. J. Slamon, B. Leyland-Jones, S. Shak et al., ?Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against her2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2,? The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 11, pp. 783?792, 2001.
  12. A. Molina, J. Codony-Servat, J. Albanell, F. Rojo, J. Arribas, and J. Baselga, ?Trastuzumab (Herceptin), a humanized anti-HER2 receptor monoclonal antibody, inhibits Basal and activated HER2 ectodomain cleavage in breast cancer cells,? Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 12, pp.4744?4749, 2001
  13. A. Hudis, ?Trastuzumab?mechanism of action and use in clinical practice,? The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 1, pp.39?51, 2007.
  14. Dent, M. Trudeau, K. I. Pritchard et al., ?Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence,? Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 15, pp. 4429?4434, 2007
  15. Y. Cho, M. H. Chang, Y. L. Choi et al., ?Potential candidate biomarkers for heterogeneity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC),?Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 753?761, 2011.
  16. PatriziaVici, Laura Pizzuti , Clara Natoli , Teresa Gamucci , Luigi Di Lauro , MaddalenaBarba ,DomenicoSergi , Claudio Botti , Andrea Michelotti , Luca Moscetti , Luciano Mariani, FiorentinoIzzo , Loretta D?Onofrio , Isabella Sperduti , Francesca Conti , Valentina Rossi , Alessandra Cassanom, Marcello Maugeri-Sacc? , Marcella Mottolese , Paolo Marchetti: Triple positive breast cancer: A distinct subtype? Cancer Treatment Reviews 41 (2015) 69?76
  17. HarriSihto, Johan Lundin, Mikael Lundin, Tiinalehtimaki, Ari Ristamaki, KaijaHolli, LiisaSailas, VesaKataja, TainaTurpeeniemi- Hujanen, JormaIsola, PaivaHeikkila, HeikkiJoensu: Breast Cancer biological subtypes and protein expression predict for the preferential distant metastasis sites : a nationalwide cohort study : Breast Cancer Reasearch 2011, 13:R87
  18. RupninderSandhu, Joel S. Parker, Wendell D. Jones, Chad A. Livasy, William B. Coleman : Microarray-Based Gene Expression Profiling for Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer and Identification of New Targets for Therapy: LabMedicine 41, 364-372
  19. Bruna Karina Banin Hirata, Julie Massayo Maeda Oda, Roberta LosiGuembarovski, Carolina Batista Ariza, Carlos Eduardo Coral de Oliveira, Maria Angelica EharaWatana : Molecular Markers for Breast Cancer: Prediction on TumorBehavior: Disease Markers Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 513158, 12 pages
  20. DilaraSavci-Heijink, Hans Halfwerk, GerittJ.Hooijer, Hugo M. HorlingsJelleWesseling, Marc J.Van de Vijver : Retrospective analysis of Metastatic behaviour of Breast Cancer Subtypes: Breast cancer Res Treat ;150(3) 547-557

[Nagpal P, Shankar A, Yadav B.S, Singh R, D. Divya, Ghoshal S. (2017); METASTATIC BEHAVIOUR OF SUBTYPES IN LOCALLY ADVANCED CARCINOMA BREAST. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (Jul). 2549-2553] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr. Puneet Nagpal
PGIMER CHANDIGARH

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4996      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4996